Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam 3V0-21.21 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 3V0-21.21 exam

Exam 3V0-21.21 topic 1 question 59 discussion

Actual exam question from VMware's 3V0-21.21
Question #: 59
Topic #: 1
[All 3V0-21.21 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.
During a requirements gathering workshop, a customer shares the following diagram regarding their availability service-level agreements (SLAs):

The customer states that there is no application level availability for legacy applications.
Which recommendation could the architect make to meet the customer's high availability requirements for the legacy applications virtual machines?

  • A. Enable vSphere HA and add a VM Override with VM Restart Priority set to Disabled
  • B. Enable Fault Tolerance
  • C. Achieve application availability with snapshots
  • D. Enable vSphere HA and add a VM Override with VM Restart Priority set to Lowest
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
nemisis95
Highly Voted 3 years, 4 months ago
The customer wants "high availability requirements for the legacy applications virtual machines". B. Enable Fault Tolerance Will provide the best option here for HA. A. Enable vSphere HA and add a VM Override with VM Restart Priority set to Disabled No - By default all VMs will have the “medium” restart priority. Disabling it won't provide any HA C. Achieve application availability with snapshots Not a great solution at all. D. Enable vSphere HA and add a VM Override with VM Restart Priority set to Lowest No - By default all VMs will have the “medium” restart priority. Setting it to Lowest will DECREASE HA vSphere HA Restart Priority https://www.yellow-bricks.com/2018/04/04/vsphere-ha-restart-priority/
upvoted 12 times
hansel
3 years, 4 months ago
Agreed D does not make any sense as its setting the VM restart priority to lowest however the stated SLA for legacy applications VMs in 99.99 which is higher than both Development VMs and General Purpose VMs - if D said highest it would be correct. B is my answer
upvoted 2 times
Mike_SK
3 years, 1 month ago
But since all groups need to meet same sla, means that all groups have FT enanled.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
FR_Wolfman
Most Recent 10 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
Right answer is B. We want a 99,99% SLA on the legacy applications : that represents only (more or less) 4 minutes of unavailability per month, which is very short. A&D : vSphere HA could be solution (hoping the VMs will start fast enough), but setting a priori to Disabled or Lowest is a non-sense. C : Snapshots do not achieve anything in terms of availability. It only helps with recoverability. B : Fault Tolerance is the only option here, even if there are a lot of constraints to implement it.
upvoted 1 times
...
Alchot
1 year, 9 months ago
Selected Answer: B
FT with all the assumptions that brings in the conversation will provide the desired SLA by having replica machines. One hour downtime a year per VM narrows down the option to FT. Other options does not offer any SLA measure. HA can experience issues if there is capacity constrain and bottleneck of power on tasks. Snapshots relay on intervention and there time is wasted. What if snapshot can't be used? SLA level of 99.99 % uptime/availability results in the following periods of allowed downtime/unavailability: Daily: 8.6s Weekly: 1m 0.48s Monthly: 4m 21s Quarterly: 13m 2.4s Yearly: 52m 9.8s
upvoted 2 times
...
Bobob55
2 years, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: D
FT isn’t simple
upvoted 1 times
...
bpexam
2 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
bpexam
2 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B is correct, see nemisis95. this is only to get the votes in the correct place
upvoted 1 times
...
Ddssssss
2 years, 8 months ago
Should we keep in mind: The maximum number of fault-tolerant VMs allowed on a host in the cluster is 4. Both Primary VMs and Secondary VMs count toward this limit.
upvoted 1 times
...
VMwareARCHI
2 years, 9 months ago
Really a bad written. it must be D. B: FT has limitation of CPU, vSphere Liz. etc
upvoted 2 times
...
Mariosoftnet
3 years, 1 month ago
From my point of view, ans D should be "Highest" priority instead of "Lowest", maybe is a typo. FT has too many requirements... not a good idea for legacy apps.. As it is right now, I go for B, but if we change this word in option D, I will prefer it
upvoted 2 times
...
tg1008
3 years, 1 month ago
Really a bad question.. If it is "The customer states that there is no application level availability for legacy applications." which means legacy apps is not available then the answer is D If it is ""The customer states that there is no application level HIGH availability for legacy applications." then the answer should be B
upvoted 3 times
...
zhongzhong5011
3 years, 3 months ago
I believe B , First , legacy application need 99.99% SO, HA is base and HT is best ! D , If you enable HA , why not keep default or set Highest but degree the priority ?
upvoted 1 times
zhongzhong5011
3 years, 2 months ago
i read the this question more ,and compare this NO 59 to 66 , D is right
upvoted 1 times
tester912
2 years, 3 months ago
66 mentions priority. It doesn't make sense to change the HA priority, that makes me thing it is B. Enable FT
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
primanturin
3 years, 4 months ago
I believe is D "The customer states that there is no application level availability for legacy applications." no application level availability, so it does not matter if the priority is the lowest. Therefore, "Enable vSphere HA and add a VM Override with VM Restart Priority set to Lowest" - D
upvoted 1 times
hansel
3 years, 4 months ago
i read this as there is no way to provide high availability within the legacy application itself (such as clustering) therefore the SLA must be met by using features at the hypervisor level.
upvoted 5 times
mnq59986
2 years, 8 months ago
And so from your comment this is exact case for FT, so answer would be B.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
nemisis95
3 years, 4 months ago
My guess is to probably keep it simple and choose D - Enable vSphere HA and add a VM Override with VM Restart Priority set to Lowest
upvoted 2 times
...
nemisis95
3 years, 4 months ago
Bad question really. Can VM Restart Priority set to Lowest let us achieve 99.99 % SLA Daily: 8s Weekly: 1m 0s Monthly: 4m 22s Quarterly: 13m 8s Yearly: 52m 35s Take a guess - B for FT, or D for HA
upvoted 1 times
Ddssssss
2 years, 8 months ago
really depends on reboot times. FT - no reboot, HA - requires reboot of legacy VMs, might not make the 99.99% uptime.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
nemisis95
3 years, 4 months ago
I've gone back to my original answer - B Answer is Fault Tolerance. The customer wants "high availability requirements for the legacy applications virtual machines"/ D is setting the Legacy Application VMs to have a VM Restart Priority set to Lowest. A is disabling it altogether. By default all VMs will have the “medium” restart priority on a cluster HA settings. https://www.yellow-bricks.com/2018/04/04/vsphere-ha-restart-priority/ C wouldn't meet a HA requirement so it leaves FT as the solution.
upvoted 2 times
...
nemisis95
3 years, 5 months ago
Changing to D as Fault Tolerance has too many Requirements and Limits
upvoted 3 times
...
yaziciali
3 years, 5 months ago
d: https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/6.0/com.vmware.vsphere.avail.doc/GUID-3DAED2B1-55B8-4877-BD0F-BC57C10A516C.html#:~:text=The%20restart%20priority%20determines%20the,on%20a%20per%2Dhost%20basis.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...