Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam 5V0-22.23 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 5V0-22.23 exam

Exam 5V0-22.23 topic 1 question 3 discussion

Actual exam question from VMware's 5V0-22.23
Question #: 3
Topic #: 1
[All 5V0-22.23 Questions]

An administrator has 24 physical servers that need to be configured with vSAN. The administrator needs to ensure that a single rack failure is not going to affect the data availability. The number of racks used should be minimized.
What has to be done and configured to achieve this goal?

  • A. Distribute servers across at least two different racks and configure two fault domains
  • B. Configure disk groups with a minimum of four capacity disks in each server and distribute them across four racks
  • C. Enable deduplication and compression
  • D. Distribute servers across at least three different racks and configure three fault domains
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Kartik
6 months, 3 weeks ago
Answer D is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
Agent001
10 months, 4 weeks ago
If fault domains are enabled, vSAN applies the active virtual machine storage policy to the fault domains instead of the individual hosts. Calculate the number of fault domains in a cluster based on the Failures to tolerate (FTT) attribute from the storage policies that you plan to assign to virtual machines. number of fault domains = 2 * FTT + 1
upvoted 2 times
...
goatbernard
1 year ago
Selected Answer: A
In the context of your initial question about distributing 24 servers across racks to survive rack failure, distributing them across two racks and configuring two fault domains should be enough to survive a single rack outage. The key is to ensure that copies of data (and their witness components) are distributed across the two fault domains capturing these two racks so that losing one rack doesn't result in loss of any data. Hence, option A. Option D would indeed provide a higher level of redundancy, allowing for the failure of two racks concurrenty without data loss, but under the constraint of trying to "minimize the number of racks used," two racks will suffice to handle a single rack failure.
upvoted 1 times
FR_Wolfman
11 months, 2 weeks ago
Unless you create a stretched cluster, you cannot have only 2 fault domains. The minimum to achieve FTT=1 is to have 3 fault domains, so 3 racks.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
Ansari678
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: D
To ensure that a single rack failure does not affect data availability in a vSAN cluster while minimizing the number of racks used, you should do the following: D. Distribute servers across at least three different racks and configure three fault domains. This approach separates the servers across multiple racks to avoid data loss due to a single rack failure. Configuring three fault domains ensures that vSAN can tolerate the loss of an entire rack while maintaining data availability. It's a good practice for fault tolerance while keeping the number of racks to a minimum.
upvoted 4 times
...
jchampion
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: D
D. https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/7.0/com.vmware.vsphere.vsan-planning.doc/GUID-FE7DBC6F-C204-4137-827F-7E04FE88D968.html#:~:text=vSAN%20requires%20at%20least%20three,an%20individual%20computing%20rack%20enclosure.
upvoted 2 times
...
ieee13940
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: D
Fault Domains should be 3
upvoted 2 times
...
azimba
1 year, 1 month ago
D is correct, A minimum of three fault domains are required to support FTT=1
upvoted 3 times
...
andretobb
1 year, 1 month ago
D is Correct
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...