Answer is correct.
Another way of looking at these three choices is to say that
a simplification change to an architecture is often driven by a requirement to reduce investment;
an incremental change is driven by a requirement to derive additional value from existing investment;
and a re-architecting change is driven by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation.
https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap15.html
"Incremental change": an incremental change may be capable of being handled via change management techniques.
Another way of looking at these three choices is to say that:
- a "simplification change" to an architecture is often driven by a requirement to reduce investment;
- an "incremental change" is driven by a requirement to derive additional value from existing investment;
- a "re-architecting change" is driven by a "requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation".
upvoted 2 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
scuzzy2010
Highly Voted 3 years, 7 months agorockyslav
Most Recent 2 years, 1 month ago