exam questions

Exam MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning All Questions

View all questions & answers for the MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning exam

Exam MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning topic 1 question 146 discussion

Actual exam question from Test Prep's MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning
Question #: 146
Topic #: 1
[All MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning Questions]

Squeaking sand produces sounds with very high frequencies between 500 and 2,500 hertz, lasting less than a quarter of a second. The peals are musically pure, often containing four or five harmonic overtones. Booming sand makes louder, low-frequency sounds of 50 to 300 hertz, which may last as long as 15 minutes in larger dunes (although typically they last for seconds or less). In addition, they are rather noisy, containing a multitude of nearby frequencies. Booms have never been observed to contain more than one harmonic of the fundamental tone.
These dramatic differences once led to a consensus that although both types of sand produce acoustic emissions, the ways in which they do so must be substantially different. In the late 1970s, however, Peter K. Haff, then at the California Institute of Technology, produced squeaks in booming sand, suggesting a closer connection between the two.
Both kinds of sand must be displaced to make sounds. Walking on some sand, for example, forces the sand underfoot to move down and out, producing squeaks.
In the case of booming sand, displacement occurs during avalanches. It is within the avalanche that sound begins and where the answers must be hiding.
Before an avalanche can occur, winds must build a dune up to a certain angle, usually about 35 degrees for dry desert sand. Once an angle is achieved, the sand on the leeward side of the dune begins to slump. Intact layers of sand slip over the layers below, like a sheared deck of cards. At the same time, the individual grains in the upper layers tumble over the grains underneath, momentarily falling into the spaces between them and bouncing out again to continue their downward journey. Their concerted up-and-down motion is believed to be the secret source of sound. Fully developed avalanches, in which sliding plates of sand remain intact for most of their motion, have the greatest acoustic output. In some places, where large amounts of sand are involved, booming can be heard up to
10 kilometers away.
Because it is caused by large volumes of shearing sand, the roaring is also loud. In fact, sounds made by booming sand can be nearly deafening, and the vibrations causing them can be so intense that standing in their midst is nearly impossible.
A good place to start in exploring the vibrational properties of sand is with the grains themselves. The mean diameter of most sand grains, whether acoustically active or not, is about 300 microns. Usually the grains in a booming dune are very similar in size, especially near the leeward crest, where the sound most often originates; such uniformity allows for more efficient shearing. Otherwise, the smaller grains impede the smooth motion of the larger ones.
Similar sizes do not alone allow sand to boom. On the contrary, the booming sands of Korizo and Gelf Kebib, also in Libya, feature an uncharacteristically broad range of particle sizes. Moreover, silent dune sand often contains grains somewhat similar to nearby booming sand.
Grains of booming sand also tend to have uncommonly smooth surfaces, with protrusions on the scale of mere microns. Booming dunes are often found at the downwind end of large sand sources; having bounced and rolled across the desert for long distances, the sand grains in these dunes are usually highly polished.
Over time a grain can also be polished by repeated shifts within a moving dune. And squeaking sand as well tends to be exceptionally smooth.
Another important factor is humidity, because moisture can modify the friction between grains or cause sand to clump together, thus precluding shearing.
Sounds occur in those parts of the dune that dry the fastest. Precipitation may be rare in the desert, but dunes retain water with remarkable efficiency. Sand near the surface dries quickly, however, and sand around a dunes crest tends to dry the fastest.
Which of the following discoveries would give the most support to the hypothesis that squeaking sand and booming sand differ only in the mechanism by which the sounds are produced?

  • A. Avalanches can be induced in squeaking sand.
  • B. Squeaking sand can be made to generate booming sounds.
  • C. Booming sounds made by dunes can be generated by mechanisms other than avalanches.
  • D. Smooth grains are not a requirement for booming sand.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️
Paragraph two of the passage contains a rather tantalizing piece of information about the two kinds of sand: squeaking sounds can be produced by sand that normally "booms." This is however not developed in the rest of the passage. In this question we are asked to consider what may be a rather radical hypothesis: that there is nothing unique about either squeaking or booming sand in terms of intrinsic physical or chemical properties; the same sand can be either kind, depending simply upon how the sound is created. We already know that booming sand can generate squeaking sounds; if, conversely, sand that is traditionally characterized as squeaking can actually produce booming, then this would strongly suggest that the hypothesis may be correct.
All the other answer choices fail to address the hypothesis. Choice A is very close to the correct choice: we know that avalanches are what create booming in booming sand. If squeaking sand can be induced to undergo avalanches, this might lead us to think that squeaking sand is similar to booming sand. However, we are not told in choice A that these avalanches produce the booming sound that essentially defines booming sand: it may be that the avalanches in squeaking sand are silent, and thus there may be something about booming sand that produces noise when undergoing an avalanche.
Choice C is incorrect because even if we discover that there are alternate ways to generate "booming," there is no reason to believe that squeaking sand will boom via these mechanisms. It is possible that only sand with certain characteristics will boom through these processes, but that squeaking sand just does not possess these characteristics.
Choice D is also incorrect since even if rough sand grains can boom, there may be other requirements for the sand that squeaking sand does not satisfy.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago