Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam CRT-450 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the CRT-450 exam

Exam CRT-450 topic 1 question 271 discussion

Actual exam question from Salesforce's CRT-450
Question #: 271
Topic #: 1
[All CRT-450 Questions]

Universal Containers has a support process that allows users to request support from its engineering team using a custom object, Engineering_Support__c.

Users should be able to associate multiple Engineering_Support__c records to a single Opportunity record. Additionally, aggregate information about the Engineering_Support__c records should be shown on the Opportunity record.

What should a developer implement to support these requirements?

  • A. Master-detail field from Opportunity to Engineering_Support__c
  • B. Lookup field from Engineering_Support__c to Opportunity
  • C. Lookup field from Opportunity to Engineering_Support__c
  • D. Master-detail field from Engineering_Support__c to Opportunity
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Nazario07
4 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
When we create M-D field we can see this onformation: Master-Detail Relationship: Creates a special type of parent-child relationship between this object (the child, or "detail") and another object (the parent, or "master") where....
upvoted 1 times
...
83f117f
6 months, 3 weeks ago
Why would be the D? Standard Objects can't be on the detail side, either the question is wrong or the answers are wrong.
upvoted 1 times
83f117f
6 months, 3 weeks ago
Nvm, D is absolutely correct.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
DavidSFDev9
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
I think the correct wording is from "child" to "master"... So, being that in this case we need Engineering_Support__c to be the child and Opportunity to be the master, in order to have one Opp related to many ES's and one ES to only one Opp. In order to setup this relationship you have to navigate to the ES object and do the setup there, you always to the setup in the object that will be on the detail side (child). Also, in order to setup a rollup summary field on the Opp that aggregates data from the ESs it's a requierment that Opp is the master and ES the child, to see it available.
upvoted 4 times
...
tMana
1 year, 8 months ago
Option A is the correct choice because when a Master-detail field is created from the parent Opportunity object to the child Engineering_Support__c object, it enforces a one-to-many relationship where each Engineering_Support__c record can be associated with only one Opportunity record. This ensures that each Engineering_Support__c record is related to a specific Opportunity record, and multiple Engineering_Support__c records can be associated with a single Opportunity record.
upvoted 2 times
Sreeteja123
8 months, 1 week ago
Your Point is correct that Opportunity should be the parent, but option D is correct as We have to create M-D Relation from Engineering_Support__c to Opportunity
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Elric_13
1 year, 8 months ago
if it's going to be shown in the Opportunity then the field is a roll-up summary on the master. isn't the supposed to be letter A?
upvoted 1 times
...
tonywang531
1 year, 9 months ago
I thought standard object cannot be detailed of the master details relationship
upvoted 1 times
DonAldos
1 year, 7 months ago
Only User and Lead Object do not support this type of relationship, the rest yes!
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...