Northern Trail Outfitters is seeking to improve the performance and security of outbound integrations from Salesforce to on-premise servers. What should the architect consider before recommending a solution?
A.
Shield Platform Encryption limitations
B.
External gateway products in use
C.
Considerations for using Deterministic Encryption
In Salesforce implementations, such a service is typically provided via an external gateway product. For example, open source options such as Apache HTTP, lighttpd, and nginix can be used. Commercial products include IBM WebSeal and Computer Associates SiteMinder. These products can be easily configured to proxy and manage all outbound Salesforce requests on behalf of the internal requester
https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.integration_patterns_and_practices.meta/integration_patterns_and_practices/integ_pat_security_considerations.htm
I think it's rather about B. Take a look at Reverse Proxy Server section here - https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.integration_patterns_and_practices.meta/integration_patterns_and_practices/integ_pat_security_considerations.htm
The gateway relates to forwarding (outbound) data so the external gateway wouldn't be relevant (not B).
Shield Platform Encryption is for cloud-based encryption and this question asks about on-prem (not A). Gateway encryption is for on-prem.
Default gateway restrictions impact outbound integrations for on-prem systems.
Why default gateways? What is logic and reason. Can some one explain?
upvoted 1 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
7a34b0e
9 months, 3 weeks agolsa3
1 year, 4 months agoNoSpamInWinter
1 year, 7 months agohammad
1 year, 10 months ago