Exam Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect topic 1 question 61 discussion

A. is not right due to FLS being enforced automatically unless query is explicitly ran with system mode. Tests with no runAs() respect the running user’s FLS permissions which is usually an admin. With sharing only deals with sharing rule access to records only. B. runAs() tests both FLS and sharing after they have been implemented. It will expose flaws in implementation as well. C. without sharing bypasses all sharing rules

Isn't it B? I may be mistaking, but: A> "With Sharing" has nothing to do with FLS. C> The code running to create the orders should insert the shares as well, so why have "WIthout Sharing"? The User running the insertion must have access to the record. B> While creating the test classes, make sure that access is granted to the rigth users.

Can't be B, since "With Sharing" restricts record access, but not object / field permissions. C doesn't make sense as it doesn't result in restricting access. B is the only one answer which sounds plausible.

Not A. "With Sharing" doesn’t do FLS , Not C. Using Without Sharing would bypass sharing rules entirely and might not accurately reflect real-world access scenarios., I think B is correct answer - By utilizing the runAs system method during testing, developers can simulate different user scenarios and ensure that the Apex managed sharing logic functions as intended for various user profiles and permissions.

Not A: "With Sharing" doesn't do FLS. Not B: "runAs" is for test classes. Between these answers "C" seems more correct. In other materials there's a different answer too: "Use "With Sharing" keyword to make sure record visibility will always be considered." which could be the answer.

I'm conflicted on this, but I think of these three most probable could be C. A doesn't make sense because with sharing controls record level access, not FLS. runAs does nothing for implementation, it is just to test in test class if the runAs user has access or not. I think C, without sharing, would give the users system level access to invoice records, which they need for this use case.

I see on another testing site that that answer is A and B Run as and With Sharing

No one thinks C is a joke ?