Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6 exam

Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner topic 11 question 2 discussion

Actual exam question from PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6
Question #: 2
Topic #: 11
[All PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6 Questions]

During stage 4, a work package was authorized for the 'delivered pilot courses' to be completed by the end of week 2. The 'finalized materials' work package will start in week 3. Both work packages have zero tolerances, and finalizing the materials is dependent on feedback from the pilot courses.
During week 1, there were some problems with the pilot courses, so at the start of week 2 the team manager rescheduled the courses to week 3, and reported this in the weekly checkpoint report as the end of week 2.
Should the team manager have reported this delay previously as an issue, and why?

  • A. Yes, because the work package to deliver the pilot courses was forecast to exceed its time tolerance.
  • B. Yes, because a team manager should not change the scheduled order of a work package.
  • C. No, because the checkpoint report for week 1 should include information on any issues that occurred.
  • D. No, because the feedback from the rescheduled courses can be used in week 4 to finalize the materials.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
ManikRoy
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: A
It Should be Option A Yes, because the work package to deliver the pilot courses was forecast to exceed its time tolerance.
upvoted 1 times
...
ravi_aws
1 year, 1 month ago
A The team manager should have reported the delay in the pilot courses as an issue previously [A]. This is because the work package to deliver the pilot courses was forecast to exceed its time tolerance, and both work packages have zero tolerances 1 2 4 5 . The team manager should have raised an issue as soon as the delay was identified, as this would have allowed the project manager to take appropriate action to mitigate the risk of the 'finalized materials' work package being delayed
upvoted 1 times
...
M477001
1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C is correct, in the question it states the team manager reports the rescheduling in the weekly checkpoint report at the end of week 2, but they know about it at the end of week 1. So it should have been reported in week 1.
upvoted 1 times
...
MEHREEN1985
1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: A
I believe the correct answer is A
upvoted 1 times
...
schris
2 years, 1 month ago
I believe the correct answer is A - as there are 0 tolerances for WP delay and 2nd WP is dependent on the 1st WP, team manager should raise an issue as soon as he realized the tolerances will be breached.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...