ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Prince2 Discussions
exam questions

Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6 exam
Go to Exam

Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner topic 3 question 10 discussion

Actual exam question from PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6
Question #: 10
Topic #: 3
[All PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6 Questions]

At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage
3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the 'e-learning course'. When preparing for a quality review of the 'e-learning course', the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register.
Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why?

  • A. Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
  • B. Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
  • C. No, because possible errors that are found when preparing for a quality review should be documented on a question list.
  • D. No, because the senior supplier should not be identified as a reviewer as part of the quality review technique.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️
by takeachance at April 21, 2020, 12:59 p.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
Ciluba
Highly Voted 4 years ago
C should be correct Page 91, Section 8.4.4 Unless some background information are missing. Who said the review activities are completed?
upvoted 8 times
Chivasa
1 year, 2 months ago
The answer C clearly states that quality review activities are completed though.
upvoted 1 times
Chivasa
1 year, 2 months ago
I was confusing B with C, my mistake
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
ravi_aws
Most Recent 1 year, 3 months ago
Therefore, the answer is B. Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed. The quality reviewers are responsible for updating the quality register as quality review activities are completed
upvoted 1 times
ManikRoy
1 year, 3 months ago
The question mentions 'While preparing for the quality review'
upvoted 2 times
...
...
ManikRoy
1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Refer to 8.4.4 Preparing For review Submit a question list to the chair and presenter ahead of the review (reviewers).
upvoted 2 times
ManikRoy
1 year, 1 month ago
Correcting my previous answer. Correct answer is option D - senior supplier can not be made reviewer as the supplier is responsible for developing the product and thus the quality review won't work.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
PieroBe
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
The Senior Supplier is the (ultimate) responsible for products to be developed in the project, so he cannot act as a reviewer of these products because it generates a conflict of interests.
upvoted 2 times
...
MortenC
1 year, 11 months ago
The question is about activity not role.....ie B
upvoted 1 times
...
Trikuta_Kaira
2 years, 4 months ago
No, because the senior supplier should not be identified as a reviewer as part of the quality review technique.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago