Exam PMP topic 1 question 655 discussion

The key to this question is that the project is in the 2nd iteration of 6 iterations. Each iteration is a mini-project. You can think of an iterative process as a trial-and-error methodology that brings your project closer to its end goal. If there is an issue you should also check in with your project stakeholders. Ask them to weigh in on the iteration, and provide any feedback.

Option C is the best choice because it involves documenting the risk and escalating it to the project sponsor, who can provide the necessary support to manage the acquisition process and mitigate potential delays. This aligns with the PMP mindset of proactive risk management and stakeholder engagement.

Since the team has realized that a key deliverable depends on the acquisition of a new device, which may not be under their control, the project manager should: 1. Register a risk: Identify the potential impact on the project timeline and scope due to the dependency on the new device. 2. Escalate to the project sponsor: Inform the sponsor about the risk and its potential impact, seeking their guidance and support in acquiring the necessary device or alternative solutions. This proactive approach enables the project manager to: - Highlight the potential roadblock early on - Seek help from the sponsor to mitigate the risk - Avoid potential delays or scope changes later in the project By escalating the risk, the project manager can ensure that the sponsor is aware of the potential issue and can provide necessary support to keep the project on track.

it is critical risk C. register and inform client

In an agile project, involving stakeholders in discussions about prioritization and adapting to changes is a common practice. If the team realizes that a key deliverable is dependent on the acquisition of a new device, involving stakeholders in the discussion about prioritizing this new deliverable can help in making informed decisions and adjusting the project scope accordingly. This aligns with the principles of agility, where collaboration with stakeholders is essential for adapting to changing circumstances.

The project manager should **C. Register a risk and escalate it to the project sponsor**. The acquisition of a new device is a significant change that could impact the project's timeline, budget, or scope. Therefore, it's important to treat this as a risk and escalate it to the project sponsor who can help make strategic decisions about how to proceed. Please note that this is a general advice and the exact course of action can vary depending on the specific circumstances and regulations of the project.

In this situation, where a key deliverable depends on the acquisition of a new device, the project manager should take a proactive approach to manage the situation. The most appropriate action would be: C. Register a risk and escalate it to the project sponsor. By registering the risk associated with the delay in acquiring the new device and escalating it to the project sponsor, the project manager is taking steps to ensure that the potential issue is brought to the attention of key decision-makers. This allows for timely awareness, discussion, and potential resolution. It also helps in aligning stakeholders and ensuring that the necessary support or resources are provided to address the risk and prevent further delays.

A makes sense: Not a risk because it is an issue. The team cannot continue work without the new device and should thus look for something else to work on while the device is being acquired.

it should be 'key deliverable' instead of 'new deliverable'

Incorporating the responsibility for the acquisition of the new device within the core project team is a proactive approach. This ensures that the team takes ownership of the issue and actively works to address it. The project manager can coordinate with team members to facilitate the acquisition process, ensuring that it aligns with project timelines and objectives.

Answer should be A becuase we dont know if they need the new device or not lets first A and if it shigh priority then c follows.

C. Register a risk and escalate it to the project sponsor

D. By including this responsibility within the core team, the project manager can ensure that the team has control over the acquisition process and can actively work to mitigate any negative impacts. Why the other choices are incorrect: A: This option doesn't directly address the acquisition process or the associated risks. B: This action is more reactive and doesn't provide a solution for managing the acquisition process C: Risks are typically escalated when they require senior management's attention to resolve, and the situation described seems to be a task that can be managed by the project team without immediate escalation.

Given that the project is only in its second iteration out of six, it might be premature to escalate the issue to the project sponsor at this stage. In an agile project, it is usually more effective to address issues and dependencies within the project team whenever possible. Therefore, in this specific context, option A (inviting stakeholders to discuss the prioritization of the new deliverable) would be a more appropriate and practical approach. This way, the team can collaborate with stakeholders to understand their needs, explore potential solutions, and collectively decide how to handle the dependency on the new device acquisition while ensuring the project's success in the long term.

Don't escalate!

The project manager should choose option C, which is to register a risk and escalate it to the project sponsor.

The best course of action for the project manager in this scenario is to register a risk and escalate it to the project sponsor. This will allow for the risk to be appropriately assessed and managed, and for the project sponsor to provide guidance and support in addressing the issue. It is important to identify risks early on in the project and to take action to mitigate or manage them in order to minimize their impact on the project schedule and budget. Detailing the reason for the deliverable delay in the status report is also important for transparency and communication with stakeholders, but it does not address the underlying issue of the missing device.