Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam PMP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PMP exam

Exam PMP topic 1 question 375 discussion

Actual exam question from PMI's PMP
Question #: 375
Topic #: 1
[All PMP Questions]

A new project manager was assigned to a project during implementation. The project manager realized that new tax policies are creating a risk for a cost overrun by 25%. The project manager updated the risk register and kept the project running as normal. The CEO has announced that the project could be cancelled since the acceptable cost overrun is only 20%. The project manager was quite surprised as this was new information.
What should the project manager have done to avoid this?

  • A. Implemented the communications management plan properly.
  • B. Implemented the stakeholder engagement plan correctly.
  • C. Provided a proper risk response.
  • D. Ensured the risk tolerance of the company was properly updated.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
rajeshtk
Highly Voted 1 year, 10 months ago
The risk tolerance of the company was 20%. PM was unaware of this information. Else, should have been prioritized the risk and developed mitigation plan for it. So I think, answer D looks closer than C. Any other thoughts?
upvoted 22 times
Kim222
3 weeks ago
i think so too
upvoted 1 times
...
AmitBI
1 year ago
Yes agree as part of risk management plan ,company's risk tolerance should have been updated and closely being monitored during project execution
upvoted 2 times
...
...
Kim222
Most Recent 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
this option is D
upvoted 1 times
...
tonybuivannghia
2 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D is correct, PM needs to know the risk tolerance of company.
upvoted 1 times
...
c8ee0e6
2 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Ensured the risk tolerance of the company was properly updated and clearly understood before updating the risk register. This includes understanding the organization's risk appetite, thresholds, and tolerance levels, including the acceptable cost overrun percentage. In this case, the project manager was unaware of the 20% acceptable cost overrun limit, which is a critical piece of information that impacts project decision-making.
upvoted 1 times
...
Bruce_Liu
8 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
Address issue directly, this one is for proper risk management.
upvoted 3 times
...
josephsafiran
8 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
The project manager should have chosen option **D. Ensured the risk tolerance of the company was properly updated**. This would have allowed the project manager to be aware of the acceptable cost overrun limit set by the company. Being aware of this limit, the project manager could have planned and managed the project accordingly to ensure that the cost overrun does not exceed the acceptable limit. Remember, understanding and managing risks within the organization's risk tolerance is a key aspect of effective project management.
upvoted 1 times
...
huynq185
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Answer is D
upvoted 1 times
...
Lucky_Cindy
10 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
D should be correct
upvoted 1 times
...
[Removed]
10 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
In my opinion, if you chose (D) what is the benefit from ensuring the tolerance level!! the CEO wants to terminate the project. However, it's a correct procedure but not with this situation. Other choices did not make sense to me. I think the best answer is (C) because you need to do a real action or response to the coming risk. My analyzing could be wrong but this is what I imagined
upvoted 2 times
...
Only12go
11 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
D. Ensured the risk tolerance of the company was properly updated. In this scenario, the project manager identified a significant risk related to new tax policies, which could lead to a cost overrun. However, the project manager did not consider the organization's risk tolerance or the acceptable level of risk for the project. It's crucial to align the project's risk management activities with the organization's risk tolerance and risk management policies.
upvoted 1 times
...
kevzzz
11 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
Effective risk responses are vital if the risk management process is to meet its objectives of “… identifying, analyzing, and responding to project risk … including maximizing … positive events and minimizing … adverse events” (Project Management Institute, 2000). The Risk Response Planning phase is arguably the most important phase of the risk management process, since this is where appropriate actions are developed in the light of identified risks—both threats and opportunities. If effective responses are not developed and implemented, the risk process will fail, and the chances of the project achieving its objectives will be reduced.
upvoted 1 times
...
victory108
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: D
D. Ensured the risk tolerance of the company was properly updated
upvoted 2 times
...
Asakthi
1 year, 1 month ago
C. Provided a proper risk response.
upvoted 1 times
...
Orochi
1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D, it is not about risk "response", it is about the risk tolerance
upvoted 3 times
...
suflam3
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D. Project manager was totally surprised that risk tolerance is 20% which meant there are no documentation on this information available for the project manager. If this information is readily available for the project manager from the start, he could have plan for proper mitigation or inform stakeholders that the cost had overrun by 25% due to new tax regulation, and not continuing with the project.
upvoted 3 times
...
JMCCRAY
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C. Provided a proper risk response. The project manager did update the risk register upon realizing the new tax policies posed a risk for cost overrun. However, simply updating the risk register is not sufficient to manage risks effectively. The project manager should have identified appropriate risk responses to mitigate or avoid the impact of the risk on the project objectives. In this case, the risk response could have included proactive cost-cutting measures to reduce the impact of the potential cost overrun, or exploring alternative approaches to the project that would not be affected by the new tax policies. By implementing a proper risk response, the project manager would have been better prepared to address the risk and avoid the potential cancellation of the project due to cost overruns.
upvoted 1 times
Goku_PMP
1 year, 1 month ago
BUT .. PM was unaware of cost over run policy. if he was then he would have defined risk response with cost over run within companies limit. this would had ensured that risk mitigation plan is placed and within organisation policy.
upvoted 1 times
zayn_1983
1 year ago
as a PM during Identify risk or plan risk respons should get references or input either OPA's or EEF's, new tax Policy is one of the EEF's.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
snagile
1 year, 4 months ago
Answer is D only
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...