During the third iteration of a project, the product owner requests another mandatory feature. This also happened in the previous two sprints, which resulted in failure and caused frustration within the team. What should the project manager do next?
A.
Request the scrum team to prioritize the product backlog
B.
Ask the product owner to prioritize the backlog with the project team
C.
Call for an internal meeting to discuss the changes and their value
D.
Incorporate the changes in the last sprint before the first release
As a project manager, the first step should be to hold an internal meeting with the team to discuss their frustrations and concerns regarding the continuous addition of mandatory features mid-sprint.
After understanding the team's frustration and concerns, the project manager should then schedule a meeting with the Product Owner. During this meeting, the project manager should share the team's feedback and concerns and discuss the impact of adding mandatory features mid-sprint on the project's success and timeline.
I liked the comments I read about C. It's right to say that the scrum team has to prioritize the Product Backlog (and the Product Owner has the final word on that and it is his responsibility). Still, the first thing is understanding how the changes are frustrating the team by discounting it with openness as the Scrum Guide says, leading the team to a better collaboration. Once the PO has it in mind they may discuss the Backlog
Before product owner prioritise it is important to discuss the root cause of changes and impacts in internal meeting so that to avoid such frequent change scenario in future.
So answer should be C
Answer is B:
What should PM do next?
Ask the product owner to prioritize the backlog with the project team, The product owner is responsible for managing and prioritizing the product backlog. By involving the team in backlog prioritization, the project manager fosters transparency and helps ensure that the team is aligned with the product owner's vision, thus minimizing frustration and failure in future sprints.
I feel C is right.
Given the scenario, the PO is adding "new features" in every sprint which causes frustation aka "conflict" so its a team issue rather backlog issue. the context of the question is that due to PO's regularly adding work into their current sprint, causes a significant team disruption.
what you guys think?
B. Ask the product owner to prioritize the backlog with the project team
In an agile project, the product owner is responsible for prioritizing the product backlog. When mandatory features are frequently added during sprints, it is essential to work with the product owner to reprioritize the backlog and avoid disrupting the team's progress
This aligns with agile principles. It encourages collaboration and transparency between the product owner and the project team. By involving the project team in the prioritization process, it ensures a shared understanding of the priorities and helps manage expectations.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Aish_
Highly Voted 2 months agoFyrus
Highly Voted 2 months agocrypto_dreams_medellin
Most Recent 2 weeks, 1 day agocrypto_dreams_medellin
2 weeks, 1 day agofragar65
1 month, 2 weeks agoPragati06
2 months agooreh
2 months, 2 weeks agoGeorgess123
2 months, 3 weeks agomesacgon
3 months, 3 weeks agomsaranya
4 months, 2 weeks agoc041644
5 months agoompk
6 months, 1 week agoManicks
7 months, 1 week agovinuuvasu
8 months, 2 weeks agohonidt
9 months agoDavard
10 months, 1 week agoBuviD
10 months, 3 weeks ago