Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Pmi Discussions
exam questions

Exam PMP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PMP exam
Go to Exam

Exam PMP topic 1 question 231 discussion

Actual exam question from PMI's PMP
Question #: 231
Topic #: 1
[All PMP Questions]

A project manager is leading a project to develop accounting software for a trading firm. As the outcomes are being delivered, a new risk is identified regarding an indirect tax regulation that is being changed by the government in the next 6 months. This risk will have a significant impact on the project outcomes.
What should the project manager do next?

  • A. Determine the impact of the risk and prioritize outcomes that do not affect the tax module.
  • B. Delay developing the indirect tax module until the tax regulation comes into effect.
  • C. Assess the impact of the risk with an expert and prioritize further outcomes with the client.
  • D. Analyze the impact of the risk and discuss with the team to determine how to separate the tax module.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️
by Nickybhai at Sept. 18, 2022, 2:44 p.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
Tunero
1 month, 3 weeks ago
After a risk is identified, the nest step is to assess the risk. Choice C is the most correct.
upvoted 1 times
...
Lucky_Cindy
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
C. Assess the impact of the risk with an expert and prioritize further outcomes with the client.
upvoted 1 times
...
Only12go
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
C. Assess the impact of the risk with an expert and prioritize further outcomes with the client. This is the best approach. Consulting with a tax expert will provide a clearer understanding of the potential changes and their implications. Moreover, involving the client ensures that they are kept in the loop and can participate in decisions about reprioritizing the project based on the new risk.
upvoted 2 times
...
sam1721
1 year, 2 months ago
I initially thought D but C makes sense as you should consult with client on the outcome.
upvoted 1 times
...
Asakthi
1 year, 3 months ago
C. Assess the impact of the risk with an expert and prioritize further outcomes with the client.
upvoted 1 times
...
Asakthi
1 year, 3 months ago
C. Assess the impact of the risk with an expert and prioritize further outcomes with the client.
upvoted 1 times
...
SteAle
1 year, 3 months ago
Answer C. Described in Section 4.1.2.1. Expertise should be considered from individuals or groups with specialized knowledge or training in the following topics: - Previous similar projects, and - Qualitative risk analysis. Expert judgment is often obtained through facilitated risk workshops or interviews. The possibility of expert views being biased should be taken into account in this process
upvoted 1 times
...
victory108
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C. Assess the impact of the risk with an expert and prioritize further outcomes with the client.
upvoted 1 times
...
AP2023S
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
A, C and D are practically the same because they perform a risk analysis in some way...but C is the only answer that requires a decision TOGETHER with the customer who must be involved.
upvoted 4 times
...
JMCCRAY
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C. Assess the impact of the risk with an expert and prioritize further outcomes with the client. The project manager should assess the impact of the new tax regulation with an expert in the field to understand the potential impact on the project. Based on this assessment, the project manager should prioritize the project outcomes with the client to determine how to move forward. This could include delaying the development of the indirect tax module until the tax regulation comes into effect, prioritizing outcomes that do not affect the tax module, or analyzing the impact of the risk with the team to determine how to separate the tax module.
upvoted 2 times
...
Hung3102
1 year, 8 months ago
D seems correct
upvoted 1 times
Hung1
1 year, 7 months ago
Change answer to C. C. Assess the impact of the risk with an expert and prioritize further outcomes with the client. The best course of action for the project manager is to assess the impact of the risk with an expert in indirect tax regulations and prioritize further outcomes with the client. This approach will help the project manager to understand the potential impact of the new regulation on the project outcomes and identify the most critical outcomes that need to be prioritized to mitigate the risk. By involving an expert in the assessment process, the project manager can also ensure that the analysis is accurate and reliable. Option D is not a suitable approach as it only considers analyzing the impact of the risk and discussing with the team to determine how to separate the tax module without involving an expert in the assessment process. This approach may lead to inaccurate or incomplete analysis, resulting in incorrect decisions and increased project risks.
upvoted 5 times
...
...
Trytrio
1 year, 9 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Would choose D
upvoted 2 times
...
Saintu
1 year, 11 months ago
Selected Answer: C
I will say C because this has to do with a new tax regulation… important to seek expert knowledge
upvoted 3 times
...
SASA2030
1 year, 11 months ago
I would say D but not sure
upvoted 1 times
...
poohwinniewong
2 years ago
C. As the project outcome needed to be discuss with clients.
upvoted 1 times
leo_gold
1 year, 11 months ago
And also because this is new regulation so they lacking knowledge and SME is a better opinion.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
KA90
2 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: A
I think A is better as it provides both virtues, keeping the project going delivering outcomes that are not affected, and assessing the risk of the new change.
upvoted 3 times
...
[Removed]
2 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: D
I'm going to say D because I don't think an expert can give a clear picture of a vague tax change that is currently classified as a risk, not an issue. Typically talking to the team means you might not even need an expert, which usually costs resources.
upvoted 2 times
rajeshtk
2 years, 1 month ago
my concern with D is 'determine how to separate the tax module'. Hope the team can separate the module for good reason for an independent future development/release.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
Load full discussion...

Get IT Certification

Unlock free, top-quality video courses on ExamTopics with a simple registration. Elevate your learning journey with our expertly curated content. Register now to access a diverse range of educational resources designed for your success. Start learning today with ExamTopics!

Start Learning for free
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel