While attending a conference, an agile practitioner learns of a new user interface (UI) framework that could benefit the team. What should the agile practitioner do next?
A.
Identify a team member to do a proof of concept using this framework
B.
Email the team directing them to immediately begin using this new framework
C.
Obtain feedback from team members on the new framework, and then suggest that the product owner create a backlog item to do a spike on it
Team Feedback: Obtaining feedback from team members allows for a collaborative evaluation of the new UI framework, ensuring that all perspectives and potential impacts are considered.
Spike: Suggesting a spike as a backlog item allows the team to research and experiment with the new framework in a controlled manner, assessing its benefits and feasibility without disrupting ongoing work.
Product Owner Involvement: Involving the product owner ensures that the evaluation of the new framework is prioritized appropriately within the product backlog.
Informed Decision-Making: This approach promotes informed decision-making based on collective input and thorough investigation, aligning with agile principles of collaboration and continuous improvement.
By encouraging discussion, collaborating with the team, and suggesting a time-boxed exploration through a spike, the agile practitioner can introduce the new framework effectively and contribute to informed decision-making within the project.
A. Proof of concept: While this offers initial insights, it might not involve the entire team and could bypass their valuable input.
B. Direct email: This directive approach contradicts Agile principles of collaboration and might overlook potential drawbacks or implementation challenges.
D. Next retrospective: Delaying the discussion might miss an opportunity to address potential improvements quickly.
C. Approaching the team for feedback and suggesting a spike in the backlog allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the new UI framework, ensuring that its adoption is a well-informed decision rather than a sudden directive or implementation without proper exploration.
Team member can initiate retrospective not only at the end of iteration but any time when process or smth else can be improved. It depends if you can make improvement on new technology without a spike.
D is good but C seems to be the best answer.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
snow5
Highly Voted 3 years, 10 months agothewalker
Most Recent 2 weeks, 6 days agochlaithem
8 months, 1 week agomelki_zedek
10 months, 3 weeks agoPetrevski
1 year, 4 months agoMinhha3
1 year, 5 months agoTompaL111
1 year, 7 months agorichck102
2 years, 2 months agothuha1704
2 years, 6 months agoWmahmoudi
3 years, 9 months agosrv3
3 years, 9 months ago