Exam PMI-ACP topic 1 question 165 discussion

C - Correct ---------- B - Incorrect and Invalid - This is a predictive tool and the situation is in an agile environment. ---------- A - Incorrect but Valid - This would be correct if not for the following sentence in the question: “This will impact several future business service offerings.” Because this would affect the business side of the product, the product owner and relevant stakeholders should be involved. ---------- D - Incorrect but Valid - It is too soon to decide to cancel the sprint with preliminary data. After collaborating with the team and relevant stakeholders and decomposing the impact and magnitude of the problem, then it would be appropriate to cancel the sprint.

My answer is C, there have no risk matrix in Agile.

Collaboration and Communication: Meeting with the team and stakeholders fosters open communication and collaboration, which is essential for addressing the underlying security issues. Rework and Rewrite Stories: By rewriting stories, the team can ensure that the new work aligns with the corrected security architecture, preventing future issues. Stakeholder Involvement: Involving stakeholders in the discussion ensures that their concerns and requirements are addressed, and they are kept informed about the project's status and necessary changes. Risk Mitigation: This approach allows the team to reassess and mitigate risks associated with the unstable security structure, ensuring a more robust and secure solution moving forward.

This is tricky, I lean towards D, although C is a probable right answer too. If all work up to date is flawed, there is no point on continuing a Sprint for what is to be flawed work.

C = correct. This is the very first step that needs to be conducted. A = nog best option. B = Individuals and interactions over processes and tools. Also, this issue was not predicted (as per the description) D = can do that, but later (if needed)

Vote C

C is better.

i vote C

C is my answer

My answer is D. If all the work to date is flawed, then the ongoing SPRINT needs to be stopped. And the project needs to be reassessed from the very first. It's not about rewriting stories, Stories should be the same as it contributes to project VISION. So I will go with D not C.

C is there correct ones mentioned all up todate deliveries are flaw. Hence rewrite of story is needed

D is the answer, everything need to be re-evaluated