Exam PMI-ACP topic 1 question 138 discussion

The most effective approach in this situation would be to facilitate a user story workshop with the agile team (Option C). This allows the team to collaboratively refine and improve the user stories, ensuring that they are clear and detailed enough to understand the requirements. Here’s why this option is beneficial: Collaborative Effort: Engages both the product owner and the agile team in the process, fostering better communication and understanding. Comprehensive Refinement: Helps identify gaps and ambiguities in the user stories, leading to more complete and actionable requirements. Skill Development: Provides an opportunity for the team to learn and improve their skills in writing effective user stories.

Option C should be correct. remaining small portion of Option-B, let me vote C. In my opinion, the B has a description of "at Retrospective meeting", this is a reason why incorrect.

A. Coaching product owner: While coaching the product owner to update acceptance criteria is helpful, it might not address broader story details and doesn't involve the team directly, risking misalignment. B. Fixing stories during retrospective: Retrospectives focus on learning and process improvement, not reworking individual stories. This approach might delay development and doesn't offer a dedicated space for detailed clarification. C. Informing product owner's manager: Escalating directly to the manager bypasses the team and the product owner, potentially creating tension and not encouraging collaborative problem-solving.

C = correct

Vote C

Vote C

C is correct. This was an easy one

i vote C

I choose C

Absolutely agree with C

C - Servant Leader - Remove impediments

C is the right answer

Retrospectives are not for that puerposes. C is the answer

C is correct

I pick C

Option should be C.

The retrospective is to review what went well etc.. not to fix the user story. I think the answer is incorrect