Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam PMI-ACP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PMI-ACP exam

Exam PMI-ACP topic 1 question 77 discussion

Actual exam question from PMI's PMI-ACP
Question #: 77
Topic #: 1
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

A legal department representative contacts the scrum master because, while the project's budget has been maintained, it has exceeded its original contracted time and scope.
What should the scrum master do?

  • A. Meet with the team to gain alignment with the legal department's need to stay within the contracted time and scope
  • B. Work with the customer to narrow the scope
  • C. Share the project's trajectory with the legal department
  • D. Meet with the legal department to help them understand that the customer and the team are satisfied with the time and deliveries
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
zvasanth3
Highly Voted 4 years, 1 month ago
my choice is D , in agile you dont lock time,budget,scope
upvoted 6 times
zvasanth1
4 years ago
C also makes sense
upvoted 1 times
...
...
HTTPS
Highly Voted 3 years, 3 months ago
D - Correct From PMI’s Agile Practice Guide, Page 77: “As mentioned earlier in this practice guide, the Agile Manifesto values “customer collaboration over contract negotiation.” Many project failures stem from breakdowns in the customer–supplier relationship. Projects incur more risk when those involved in the contract take the perspective of winners vs. losers. A collaborative approach is one that pursues a shared-risk-reward relationship, where all sides win.”
upvoted 6 times
...
thewalker
Most Recent 3 weeks, 2 days ago
Selected Answer: C
The best course of action for the Scrum Master in this situation is C. Share the project's trajectory with the legal department. Reasoning: Transparency: Sharing the project’s trajectory with the legal department ensures transparency and helps them understand the reasons behind the changes in time and scope. It’s important to keep legal informed, as they may need to adjust contracts or communicate changes to other stakeholders. Alignment: By sharing the current status, the Scrum Master can work with the legal department to ensure that any contractual obligations are managed properly, potentially avoiding legal or compliance issues. Informed Decision-Making: This approach allows the legal department to provide advice or guidance on how to proceed in a way that maintains compliance with the original contract or revises it as needed.
upvoted 1 times
thewalker
3 weeks, 2 days ago
Option A (gaining team alignment with legal needs) and Option B (working with the customer to narrow the scope) may be necessary steps, but first, the legal department needs to be fully informed about the project’s current trajectory. Option D (helping the legal department understand team and customer satisfaction) is important, but it should come after sharing the project’s trajectory and ensuring that legal considerations are met.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
janojano
7 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
How can we go for D., when we do not know if "the customer and the team are satisfied with the time and deliveries". Answer D. is assuming that's the case but the problem set does not lay that assumption. I like C. the most neutral answer that would lead to further conversations.
upvoted 1 times
...
Heinous
11 months, 3 weeks ago
option C is the most neutral and informational approach. It allows the legal department to understand the project's current situation and helps them make informed decisions or adjustments as needed. It's important for all stakeholders to have a clear picture of the project's progress to make informed decisions about scope, time, and budget.
upvoted 1 times
...
Agile_Dario_Conde
1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B, in Agile the scope is not fixed but the time and budget are fixed.
upvoted 1 times
...
Petrevski
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D seems to be correct, but only if the customer and the team are really satisfied with the time and deliveries. If not - D cannot be the right answer. A - not an agile approach (Customer collaboration over contract negotiation) B - not an agile approach (Responding to change over following a plan) C - what for? That would be, after D.
upvoted 1 times
...
Minhha3
1 year, 5 months ago
Vote D
upvoted 1 times
...
Smokeyofficiial
1 year, 6 months ago
Option C. In Agile Framework, transparency is a key principle, and the Scrum Master is responsible for ensuring that all stakeholders have a clear understanding of the project's progress. In this scenario, the Scrum Master should share the project's trajectory with the legal department to provide them with a clear understanding of why the project has exceeded its original contracted time and scope. This will help the legal department make informed decisions about how to proceed and will enable them to collaborate with the Scrum Master and the team to find a solution that meets the project's needs while staying within the contracted time and scope. Option A and B may be part of the solution, but sharing the project's trajectory is the necessary first step. Option D is not an appropriate course of action as it does not address the legal department's concern and may undermine the trust between stakeholders.
upvoted 2 times
...
InvisibleBeing
1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B sounds better. "A" cannot be the answer because the team has ALREADY EXCEEDED the promised delivery time. Option "A" talks about aligning the team to respect the original time and scope, but it is ALREADY TOO LATE. It cannot be D. Contracts are there for a reason. In agile, time and cost are fixed but scope is variable. You cannot ignore contracts. There are penalties mentioned in the contracts for not meeting the deadlines. Customer experience is also affected. Whatever happens next, has to happen after consulting with the customer.
upvoted 2 times
InvisibleBeing
1 year, 7 months ago
I was just thinking and realized that product owner is the one that negotiates with the customer and not the Scrum Master, so it should be the PO negotiating the scope with the customer and not the scrum master. But then I thought that PO is the customer. PO is mostly from the customer side because PO is someone with years of experience and who understands the product very well. What I am trying to say here is that: PO is the customer, and the scrum master needs to negotiate the scope with the PO/Customer.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
richck102
2 years, 2 months ago
i vote D
upvoted 1 times
...
nezumi91
2 years, 4 months ago
i choose B, in agile Time and Cost are fix. only scope can change
upvoted 2 times
...
JackNguyenvn
2 years, 5 months ago
D is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
aws_guru1
2 years, 12 months ago
People's answers to this question are very bad. Readers are more confused than before.
upvoted 1 times
Nutchin
2 years ago
so, whats best answer. Pls
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Deer
3 years ago
a is my answer, Fixed Time and Cost, Change Scope
upvoted 2 times
...
STW
3 years ago
Answer B is valid, narrow the scope.
upvoted 1 times
...
Alaaradwan
3 years, 2 months ago
D the correct
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...