Exam PMP topic 1 question 1049 discussion

first analyse then look for solutions to teach

Addressing the issue within the team itself (Option D) by evaluating their skills and abilities can often be a proactive and effective approach. It allows the team to take ownership of their performance and identify areas where they may need improvement. Additionally, it promotes team development and self-improvement, which can lead to more sustainable long-term results. Bringing in an external SME (Option C) can be valuable in certain situations, especially if the team lacks specific knowledge or expertise in a critical area. However, it should be considered as a complementary step rather than the first resort.

D. Evaluate the issue with the team to determine if they have the necessary skills to perform assignments. This option suggests a proactive approach to address the performance issue by evaluating whether the team members possess the required skills for their assignments. Identifying any skill gaps allows the project manager to take corrective actions such as providing additional training, mentoring, or reallocating resources to ensure the team's competence and improve the quality of their work.

While it's essential to assess the team's skills, the immediate concern seems to be related to the quality and timeliness of their work. Therefore, involving a local subject matter expert (SME) to review project requirements (option C) addresses the potential root cause of the issues observed, providing a more targeted approach. If, during the review, a lack of skills is identified, the project manager can then take appropriate actions to address that aspect.