Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam PMP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PMP exam

Exam PMP topic 1 question 1035 discussion

Actual exam question from PMI's PMP
Question #: 1035
Topic #: 1
[All PMP Questions]

A few key team members recently left the project team. The remaining members took time to understand the details and found it difficult to make progress. As a result, the project schedule is seriously delayed.

What should the project manager do?

  • A. Request additional resources to be incorporated to the project team.
  • B. Observe the project team and give them time to catch up before escalating.
  • C. Escalate to the project sponsor and seek alternatives to resolve the issue.
  • D. Review the issues and adjust the project plan to give a realistic schedule.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
victory108
1 month ago
Selected Answer: D
D. Review the issues and adjust the project plan to give a realistic schedule
upvoted 1 times
...
9RedFox_JB
2 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
review the issues. escalation from my point should be the last point
upvoted 1 times
...
martinx84
3 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
Review first the issues
upvoted 1 times
...
Trytrio
9 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
Its C - you need CCB approval to change the schedule. Clearly it must be reported - since its critical
upvoted 1 times
...
Trytrio
9 months, 3 weeks ago
Its C - you need CCB approval to change the schedule. Clearly it must be reported - since its critical
upvoted 1 times
...
Delab202
10 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
In this situation, the most appropriate action for the project manager would be: D. Review the issues and adjust the project plan to give a realistic schedule. Escalating to the project sponsor is a viable option, but it is typically more effective after internal efforts to adjust and manage the situation have been explored. Directly escalating could imply that the project manager hasn't taken sufficient steps to manage the situation at their level.
upvoted 1 times
...
chlaithem
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
Early intervention and transparency: Delays can snowball. Informing the sponsor early allows for timely intervention and exploration of potential solutions. Seek support and alternatives: Discuss the reasons for the delay, the team's efforts, and the remaining challenges. Collaboratively explore options like: Hiring replacements: If feasible, request additional resources to fill critical skill gaps. Shifting priorities or scope: Adjust the project plan to focus on delivering core functionalities within the revised timeline. Seeking external expert support: Consider temporary collaboration with external consultants to bridge knowledge gaps. Joint decision-making: Work with the sponsor to assess the available options and choose the most suitable course of action that balances project viability with stakeholder expectations.
upvoted 1 times
...
Abdelmonm
10 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
This option recognizes the severity of the situation and involves escalating the issue to the project sponsor, who can provide necessary support, explore alternatives, and make decisions at a higher level to address the challenges. It's crucial to involve key stakeholders, particularly the project sponsor, when faced with significant project disruptions to ensure timely and effective resolution.
upvoted 1 times
...
Jaya12
11 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
Adjusting the project plan internally is typically the first step to mitigate the impact of such changes, while escalation might be necessary in certain situations, in this specific case, the most practical approach would be to first review the issues internally and adjust the project plan to create a more realistic schedule based on the current team's capacity.
upvoted 2 times
...
cb4a6c4
11 months, 3 weeks ago
"C" it is.
upvoted 1 times
...
Hanbyul
11 months, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
It is internal problem of project team that the key team member left, so it is not proper to change project schedule due to internal issue.
upvoted 3 times
Jaya12
11 months, 2 weeks ago
Escalating to the project sponsor might be necessary if the project manager determines that the team cannot overcome the challenges internally or if there's a need for external intervention, additional resources, or significant changes to the project's objectives or scope.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
certificate988
12 months ago
Selected Answer: C
D should not be answer as schedule can't change w/o change control process. A and B cannot be answer as project is 'seriously' delayed and these option can't fix the schedule. C seems best answer compared to other options as it require escalation before schedule can be changed.
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...