A project team has run into an issue with a vendor who is known for a lack of quality. The project manager must ensure that the quality problem is addressed appropriately.
What should the project manager do to start the issue resolution process?
A.
Meet with the vendor and request corrective actions.
B.
Engage the test team to improve the quality.
C.
Review the risk register and follow the response strategy.
D.
Update the risk register and document any corrective actions.
A is correct.
The team is having an ISSUE with the vendor. Issues are materialized risks. So the focus shifts from managing a risk to resolving the issue. And to resolve the issue, first meet with the vendor.
corrective action before having an issue but now we have an issue and Meeting with the vendor (option A) and requesting corrective actions could be part of the response strategy
In this situation, the project manager should meet with the vendor and request corrective actions (Option A). This direct approach allows the project manager to discuss the quality issues with the vendor and work together to find a solution. It’s important to maintain open and honest communication with vendors to ensure that they understand the project’s quality standards and expectations. Remember, effective vendor management is key to successful project delivery.
Since the vendor is known for quality issues, then the risk had to have been identified when the risk register was created. Consult the risk register and follow the plan.
In this situation, the first step in the issue resolution process is to directly engage with the vendor and request corrective actions. Meeting with the vendor allows the project manager to communicate the quality concerns, discuss the specific issues, and collaborate on finding solutions. It's important to address the problem at its source and work with the vendor to implement corrective actions that align with the project's quality standards. Additionally, documenting the discussions and any agreed-upon corrective actions is crucial for proper issue resolution and future reference.
This option emphasizes leveraging existing risk management tools and pre-defined mitigation plans. By reviewing the risk register, the project manager can:
Identify the specific risk associated with the vendor's unreliable quality.
Recall the previously documented response strategy for this risk, which likely includes specific actions and escalation procedures.
Implement the documented response strategy efficiently and with minimal delay.
A. Meet with the vendor and request corrective actions.
Engaging with the vendor directly is a proactive step to address the quality issue. By having a meeting with the vendor, the project manager can communicate the concerns, discuss potential solutions, and request corrective actions to improve the quality. This direct communication helps in resolving the issue in a timely and effective manner. After the meeting, any agreed-upon corrective actions can be documented, and the project manager can monitor the vendor's progress in addressing the quality problem.
Sorry, I change my answer to C. By reviewing this document (risk register), the project manager can follow pre-planned actions that were determined to mitigate or address this type of issue. This ensures a systematic approach to managing the problem based on previously agreed-upon plans. If the issue with the vendor was anticipated and documented as a risk, the risk response strategy will provide clear, pre-defined steps to handle it. This can include actions such as engaging with the vendor, implementing additional quality checks, or seeking alternative vendors.
C. Review the risk register and follow the response strategy.
While it's good practice to refer to the risk register and response strategies, this option does not directly address the immediate need for corrective actions. Reviewing the risk register is part of a broader risk management process and may not lead to a timely resolution of the quality issue.
It´s a vendor meet for their quality problems, so for sure the risk and the action response plan is defined in advance.
upvoted 3 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
TestNick001
Highly Voted 1 year, 3 months agoRomanPorcupine
Most Recent 3 days, 3 hours agojosephsafiran
9 months, 2 weeks agojosephsafiran
10 months, 3 weeks agokevzzz
11 months agoAbdelmonm
11 months agochlaithem
11 months agoUppersquareCapital
11 months agoUppersquareCapital
6 months, 3 weeks agoodylec
11 months, 3 weeks agoodylec
11 months, 3 weeks agoBonds88
1 year agovictory108
1 year, 2 months agoDavid983
1 year, 2 months ago