Stakeholders are unhappy because they have not been consulted on a user interface (UI) for a project that will have a significant impact on end users once it is launched. How should this situation be handled?
A.
The agile team should engage stakeholders regarding the proposed designs and ensure that sufficient engagement occurs throughout the project in an adaptive way.
B.
The agile practitioner should inform the stakeholders that the UI has already been approved by the project team and the project sponsor, so the team is committed to staying the course.
C.
All stakeholders should go through the approved project charter and the business requirements document to reduce the number of late changes or requests.
D.
The stakeholders should contact the project sponsor to get the project halted until new requirements are agreed upon.
In agile methodologies, continuous stakeholder engagement is crucial for ensuring that the product meets their needs and expectations. Engaging stakeholders throughout the project helps in validating the user interface designs early and often, allowing for iterative feedback and adjustments.
Other options are less suitable because:
B: Informing stakeholders that the UI is already approved without further engagement dismisses their concerns and risks misalignment with their needs and expectations.
C: While reviewing project documents is important, it does not replace the need for active and ongoing stakeholder consultation throughout the project.
D: Halting the project is an extreme measure and may not be necessary if the agile team can address the stakeholders’ concerns through active engagement and iterative feedback.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
thewalker
2 months, 2 weeks agoNervys
1 year agoPetrevski
1 year, 2 months ago