Exam PMI-ACP topic 1 question 305 discussion

Increased duration of feedback cycles indicates that the team is experiencing delays in communication or decision-making, which is a common challenge in geographically dispersed teams. This can signal issues with collaboration and coordination, which are often exacerbated when team members are not co-located. Other options are less indicative of collaboration problems because: A: Sending more emails might indicate an increase in communication, but it doesn’t necessarily mean the team is not working well together. C: An increase in velocity could be a sign of improved productivity or effective adaptation by the new team members, rather than a problem. D: Requests to move meetings due to time differences are a normal adjustment in remote work and do not directly indicate poor team dynamics.

B is correct

Delayed communication: An increase in feedback cycle duration points to potential communication delays and bottlenecks. This could be due to asynchronous interactions, lack of clear communication channels, or time zone differences impacting collaboration. Reduced iteration speed: Longer feedback cycles slow down the development process, hindering the team's ability to iterate quickly and deliver value efficiently. This can lead to frustration and a sense of disconnect between the remote and co-located team members. Risk of misunderstandings: Delayed feedback increases the risk of misunderstandings and misinterpretations, especially in asynchronous communication. This can lead to rework, frustration, and ultimately, project delays.

B is correct

B = correct