Exam PMP topic 1 question 815 discussion

C is alright

I would also go with the C. but I did had a case that provider was constantly delaying his deliverables, and we did proposed for them that if they not delivering what they promised they should cover needed effort on their side or mare more realistic assumptions. at that moment it seemed good approach, because we knew the provider and we where in a good relationship. penalties would would have seemed as a unpleasant punishment.

once again, the system says something that morally doesn't sound right. How can you ask (TELL) a company, even if it has messed up in the past, that it needs to work unpaid overtime? You'd think that if your Lesson Learned is that consistently this contractor does not provide the correct quoted equipment, and thus causes delay, that they would build that Lag time into a project plan, but not sure how it would go over at the other company...i'd ask for legal advise, and agree with the other answer every agrees to, add the penalty fees and update the risk register.

In this situation, adding penalty clauses to the contract is a proactive measure to address the provider's historical issue of failing to meet deliverable dates. Penalty clauses can create accountability and provide a financial incentive for the provider to meet the specified deadlines. This approach helps mitigate the risk associated with the provider's past performance. Additionally, updating the risk register is crucial to document the identified risk, the chosen mitigation strategy (penalty clauses), and any other relevant information. This ensures that the project manager and the team are aware of the risk and the planned response, facilitating effective risk management throughout the project.

This option focuses on contractual protection and managing potential delays. By incorporating penalty clauses: You incentivize the provider to adhere to deadlines by imposing financial consequences for missed deliverables. You provide leverage for negotiating extensions or seeking compensation if deadlines are not met. Updating the risk register ensures proactive identification and mitigation strategies for identified risks, including potential delays from the chosen provider. You can: Analyze the specific reasons for past missed deadlines and develop contingency plans to address them (e.g., increased communication, milestones, progress checks). Consider alternative solutions or backup plans in case delays become inevitable.

Working overtime may not be legal in some countries, so encourage vendor work overtime may not be a possible solution. So C should be the correct answer.

C. Add penalty clauses to the contract and update the risk register. Given the provider's history of not meeting deliverable dates, it would be prudent for the project manager to anticipate potential delays. Adding penalty clauses to the contract can serve as a deterrent for the provider, encouraging them to adhere to timelines. Additionally, updating the risk register will ensure that the project team is aware of the potential risk and can plan accordingly.

C for me

C. Add penalty clauses to the contract and update the risk register

It's C

It's C.

add penalty to encourage the vender to produce good quality

C. Add penalty clauses to the contract and update the risk register.