During a retrospective, a team member claims that a specific set of documentation that is continuously updated during iterations is not being used by any stakeholder. What should the team do?
A.
Continue updating the documentation but initiate an analysis to identify its value and act on the findings.
B.
Stop updating the documentation since no one is using it.
C.
Continue updating the documentation since it is clearly required by the process.
D.
Stop updating the documentation and initiate an analysis to identify its value and act on the findings.
Maintain Continuity: Continuing to update the documentation ensures that no critical information is lost while the analysis is being conducted. This prevents any potential gaps in knowledge that might arise if the documentation is suddenly stopped. Value Analysis: Initiating an analysis to identify the value of the documentation helps the team understand whether the documentation is necessary and how it can be improved or repurposed to better serve stakeholders. Data-Driven Decision: This approach allows the team to make data-driven decisions based on the findings of the analysis, ensuring that any changes to the documentation process are justified and beneficial. Stakeholder Engagement: By analyzing the value of the documentation, the team can engage with stakeholders to understand their needs and preferences, potentially leading to more useful and relevant documentation.
Continuous Improvement: This method aligns with the agile principle of continuous improvement, as it encourages the team to regularly evaluate and enhance their processes and outputs.
B. Stop updating the documentation since no one is using it: Stopping the updates immediately without analysis might lead to the loss of potentially valuable information and does not provide insights into why the documentation is not being used.
C. Continue updating the documentation since it is clearly required by the process: Blindly following the process without evaluating the actual value of the documentation can lead to wasted effort and resources.
D. Stop updating the documentation and initiate an analysis to identify its value and act on the findings: Stopping the updates before conducting the analysis might result in missing critical information and does not ensure continuity.
according to agile manifesto : working software over comprehensive documentation, If a specific set of documentation is not being used by any stakeholder, continuing to update it could be considered wasteful. Stopping the updates immediately aligns with the principle of favoring working software over comprehensive documentation. At the same time, initiating an analysis ensures that the team carefully evaluates whether the documentation has any hidden value or potential future use.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
thewalker
1 week, 5 days agothewalker
1 week, 5 days agothewalker
1 week, 5 days agoPuranDom
1 month agoEmily87
8 months agopatti13
9 months, 2 weeks agodaichou
1 year agoPetrevski
1 year agozayn_1983
4 weeks, 1 day agoPetrevski
1 year ago