An agile team wants to collectively determine a project's size. What will the team be doing if they use the planning poker technique to accomplish this?
A.
Estimating story points by comparing them to similar, past features
B.
Estimating stories by placing them in buckets
C.
Using the number of dots for votes to estimate story points
D.
Estimating the relative size of stories by using story points
When using the planning poker technique, an agile team collectively estimates the relative size of user stories by assigning story points. Each team member provides their estimate for a story, and through discussion, the team reaches a consensus on the final story point estimate.
A. Estimating story points by comparing them to similar, past features.
While planning poker involves relative estimation, it's not about directly comparing stories to past features but rather assigning points based on perceived effort, complexity, or size.
B. Estimating stories by placing them in buckets.
This refers to bucket estimation, a different estimation technique, not planning poker.
C. Using the number of dots for votes to estimate story points.
This technique describes dot voting, which is unrelated to planning poker. Planning poker uses cards or estimates, not dots.
When an agile team needs to come up with the estimates for their user stories, the most common way of
doing this is a collaborative game calledplanningpoker
D
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
thewalker
2 weeks, 1 day agothewalker
2 weeks, 1 day agoyassoraa88
1 month, 1 week agoTonome
9 months, 4 weeks agoPetrevski
1 year, 1 month ago