Discussing the value of the change for the project with the customer is the most appropriate initial step. This approach ensures that both parties understand the implications and benefits of the requested change. It opens a dialogue to assess whether the change aligns with the project's goals and objectives and how it might impact the overall project.
A. This option is premature. Amending the contract should come after a thorough discussion and agreement on the value and impact of the change.
C. While evaluating effort and impact is important, involving the steering committee and shareholders should come after the initial discussion with the customer. This ensures that the change is worth considering before escalating it.
D. This option is too rigid and may not address the customer's needs effectively. It could lead to dissatisfaction and a lack of flexibility in managing project changes.
Question, if it is obviously out of contract, does Agile team contribute to customer?
e.g. software development team working under contract requested for designing an office room which be installed / utilized their software. In case, does teams should work for customer ?
in my opinion in this case, choose Option-A
Agile Manifesto is customer collaboration over contract negotiation. If we choose A, does it satisfy the Agile Manifesto? I think it should be D
upvoted 1 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
thewalker
1 week, 5 days agoPuranDom
1 month agopatti13
9 months, 2 weeks agoPetrevski
1 year agoLucyPMI
1 year, 1 month agoNhuho
1 year, 1 month ago