The given answer D is correct - my previous answers are wrong. There's 2 policies at play here - the security and NAT policy. I thought the question related to the NAT policy - it doesn't - it asks about the security policy.
I believe the answer here is B, as the NAT is done on the untrusted side therefore the security policy has to untrusted (any) to untrusted (DNAT), within the NAT configuration the real address would be mapped and so would the DMZ zone.
Answer is D
"It then evaluates and applies any security policies that match the packet based on the original (pre-NAT) source and destination addresses, but the post-NAT zones".
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-admin/networking/nat/nat-policy-rules/nat-policy-overview#:~:text=It%20then%20evaluates%20and%20applies%20any%20security%20policies%20that%20match%20the%20packet%20based%20on%20the%20original%20(pre%2DNAT)%20source%20and%20destination%20addresses%2C%20but%20the%20post%2DNAT%20zones
As @Surfside92 mentioned, according to CBT Nuggets video (watched the same) answer should be B.
However, @ntir shared the link which shows literally this situation. I would go with D because it's from PA site.
D
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-admin/networking/nat/nat-configuration-examples/destination-nat-exampleone-to-one-mapping#ide8f6a4b3-f875-4855-acb5-5fd9ad918d04
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Surfside92
Highly Voted 2 years, 3 months agode7cdfd
Most Recent 1 month, 3 weeks agoJallic
3 months, 3 weeks agoRuss_A7x
10 months, 2 weeks agoKvant
1 year, 5 months agoGrace_Shu
1 year, 7 months agoAaron_0801
1 year, 8 months agonolox
1 year, 9 months agontir
1 year, 11 months agoBeforeScope
2 years agoOteslar
2 years, 1 month agoPunkSp
2 years, 1 month agoSurfside92
2 years, 3 months agoSurfside92
2 years, 3 months ago