What is an advantage public cloud WildFire has over the private WildFire appliance?
A.
signatures being available within minutes to protect global users once malware has been submitted
B.
generating malware reports
C.
using different types of operating systems (OSs) to test malware against
D.
generating antivirus and domain name system (DNS) signatures for discovered malware and assigning a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) category to malicious links
I say A is the correct one because private WildFire appliance automatically deploy protection across local next-generation firewalls.
I discard:
B- Private and public cloud generate malware reports.
C- The WF engine (private or cloud) do the analysis in different OS.
D- WF appliance can also generate AV and DNS signatures, also URL categories.
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/advanced-wildfire/administration/advanced-wildfire-overview/advanced-wildfire-subscription
WildFire private cloud analysis does not support APK, Mac OS X, Linux (ELF), archive (RAR/7-Zip), and script (JS, BAT, VBS, Shell Script, PS1, and HTA) files
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
ArangoTopics
Highly Voted 1 year agock19
Most Recent 2 months, 1 week agock19
2 months, 1 week agowsdeffwd
3 months, 2 weeks agof143c37
1 year agoscanossa
8 months, 3 weeks agomushi4ka
1 year, 9 months ago