A customer finds that an open alert from the previous day has been resolved. No auto-remediation was configured. Which two reasons explain this change in alert status? (Choose two.)
The two reasons that could explain the change in alert status are:
A. User manually changed the alert status. Even without auto-remediation configured, a user with the appropriate permissions can manually change the status of an alert.
C. Resource was deleted. If the resource related to the alert was deleted, the alert would be resolved because the issue no longer exists.
Tricky Question. I think B and C.
RESOURCE_DELETED
Resource was deleted.
USER_DISMISSED
Alert was dismissed or snoozed by the Prisma Cloud administrator with role of System admin, Account Group Admin, or Account and Cloud Provisioning Admin.
POLICY_UPDATED
Policy was updated. This status indicates a change in the policy RQL that results in a resource not being in scope for the policy evaluation.
Yes, Band are correct options.
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma/prisma-cloud/prisma-cloud-admin/manage-prisma-cloud-alerts/prisma-cloud-alert-resolution-reasons
correct anser should be A & C.
based on the reference provided. No external services listed in the reference list.
upvoted 1 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
SakeBomb
Highly Voted 2 years, 8 months agoMig_MAM
Most Recent 3 months agoJohnOrtiz
4 months agoSpippolo
1 year, 3 months agokumar_57
1 year, 5 months agoRavi221
1 year, 11 months agoSakeBomb
2 years, 8 months agoSakeBomb
2 years, 8 months ago[Removed]
3 years ago