An administrator has been asked to configure active/passive HA for a pair of Palo Alto Networks NGFWs. The administrator assigns priority 100 to the active firewall. Which priority is correct for the passive firewall?
The lower the number, the higher the priority.
So if active is higher priority, therefore assigned 100 , then the only one that will be second priority will be with number larger than 100 so Only 255 is applicable. Therefore D is the correct answer.
The firewalls in an Active-Passive HA pair can be assigned a device priority value to indicate a preference for which firewall should assume the active role. If you need to use a specific firewall in the HA pair for actively securing traffic, you must enable the preemptive behavior on both the firewalls and assign a device priority value for each firewall. The firewall with the lower numerical value, and therefore higher priority, is designated as active. The other firewall is the passive firewall.
The firewall you plan to make active must have a lower numerical value than its peer. So, if Peer A is to function as the active firewall, keep the default value of 100 and increment the value on PeerB.
firewall with the lower numerical value, and therefore higher priority, is designated as active.
upvoted 3 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Yasi
Highly Voted 4 months agoStevenWilliams0728
Most Recent 4 months ago327c7c8
9 months, 4 weeks agoMarshpillowz
12 months agolol12
2 years, 3 months agoTAKUM1y
2 years, 3 months agoniklaus
2 years, 7 months agoKhalidB
2 years, 11 months agodgetaneh
3 years, 7 months agotheroghert
3 years, 11 months agolol1000
4 years, 2 months agonk12
4 years, 5 months agoNib2002
4 years, 6 months agocloudguy365
4 years, 8 months ago