An AHV administrator wants to take advantage of both maximized network throughput and redundancy for some nodes. Which bond mode should the administrator choose to fit this scenario?
LACP with Balance-TCP
Taking full advantage of bandwidth provided by multiple links to upstream switches, from
a single VM, requires dynamically negotiated link aggregation and load balancing using
balance-tcp. Nutanix recommends dynamic link aggregation with LACP instead of static link
aggregation due to improved failure detection and recovery.
Naah, Nutanix doesn’t recommend balance-slb because of the multicast traffic caveats. To combine the bandwidth of multiple links, consider using link aggregation with LACP and balance-tcp instead of balance-slb. Don’t use balance-slb unless you verify that the multicast limitations described here aren’t present in your network.
Yeah and for the redundancy part, I know balance-tcp fails back to active-backup in case of a link failure. I'm not sure if the same is true of balance-slb
upvoted 1 times
...
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.NCP Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
mjcher
8Â months, 2Â weeks agoejimenezn
11Â months, 1Â week agooliv_
1Â year, 2Â months agoQuietman
1Â year, 6Â months agoRandy_Sievers
1Â year, 2Â months ago