Exam AZ-204 topic 1 question 29 discussion

For definitions use the Code View, for the Workflows use the Designer I think

Since the question says developer, I think B(the Logic App Code View) should be the answer

for code changes in json use code view, for designing workflows use app designer, to edit workflow use EIP

The most appropriate option for editing workflows in an existing Logic App would be: D. the Logic Apps Designer The Logic Apps Designer provides a visual interface for creating and modifying Logic App workflows. It allows you to easily design workflows using pre-built connectors and triggers without needing to write code. This option is commonly used for making changes to existing Logic App workflows.

D. The Logic Apps Designer is a visual interface provided by Azure Logic Apps that allows you to design, modify, and manage your logic app workflows.

Gpt sad that is D

Correct answer is: The Logic Apps Designer is the graphical interface provided by Azure Logic Apps for designing and editing workflows. It allows you to visually create, edit, and manage the workflow by connecting various actions and triggers. Option B (Logic App Code View) is used when you want to view or edit the underlying workflow definition in JSON format. If you prefer to work with the code or need to make specific changes that are easier to express in JSON, you can use the Code View.

The Logic App Code View is the preferred method for editing Logic App workflows. It provides a JSON-based editor that allows developers to have full control over the workflow definition. This includes the ability to add, modify, and delete workflow steps, as well as configure the properties of each step.

chatGPT chose B and D. You can indeed use both the Logic App Code View (option B) and the Logic Apps Designer (option D) to edit workflows for an existing Logic App. The choice between them depends on your preference and the specific requirements of your task. Logic App Code View (option B): This allows you to edit the Logic App's underlying JSON definition directly. It provides more granular control and is suitable for developers who prefer working with JSON or need to make intricate changes to the Logic App's structure. Logic Apps Designer (option D): This provides a visual interface to design Logic Apps using pre-built triggers, actions, and connectors. It's a more user-friendly option for those who prefer a graphical approach and don't need to work directly with the JSON definition. Both options are valid tools for editing workflows, and the choice depends on your familiarity with JSON, your specific task requirements, and personal preference.

Both Code View and Designer can be used to edit the workflow. But it's easier to edit the workflow in the designer, so I think that is what we *should* use. We shouldn't use the more complicated tool just because we are developers.

Edit Workflow, so Designer

D. the Logic Apps Designer

May be "Enterprise Integration Pack (EIP)" correct ans as per this portal because we don't know context of this que. in exam may be given some case study before this que.

How to understand the given explanation "For business-to-business (B2B) solutions and seamless communication between organizations, you can build automated scalable enterprise integration workflows by using the Enterprise Integration Pack (EIP) with Azure Logic Apps." to edit the workflow for the logic App?

Logic App Code View because your are developer. designer is for "designer" who do not need has coding skills

Shoud be A

There is nothing in the question about EIP. I'm a developer and I still use the Designer. I'd answer D