exam questions

Exam DP-203 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the DP-203 exam

Exam DP-203 topic 1 question 17 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's DP-203
Question #: 17
Topic #: 1
[All DP-203 Questions]

You have an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 container that contains 100 TB of data.
You need to ensure that the data in the container is available for read workloads in a secondary region if an outage occurs in the primary region. The solution must minimize costs.
Which type of data redundancy should you use?

  • A. geo-redundant storage (GRS)
  • B. read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS)
  • C. zone-redundant storage (ZRS)
  • D. locally-redundant storage (LRS)
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
meetj
Highly Voted 2 months, 3 weeks ago
B is right Geo-redundant storage (with GRS or GZRS) replicates your data to another physical location in the secondary region to protect against regional outages. However, that data is available to be read only if the customer or Microsoft initiates a failover from the primary to secondary region. When you enable read access to the secondary region, your data is available to be read at all times, including in a situation where the primary region becomes unavailable.
upvoted 117 times
dev2dev
2 years, 11 months ago
A looks correct answer. RA-GRS is always avialable because its auto failover. Since this is not asked in the question but more importantly the question is about reducing cost which GRS.
upvoted 35 times
kenmexam
2 years, 1 month ago
The question clearly says "is available for read workloads in a secondary region". This is only available when choosing RA-GRS.* With GRS, when a disaster happens in the primary region, the user has to initiate a failover so that the secondary region becomes the primary region**. At no point you are reading from your secondary region with GRS. Hence i believe the answers should be B. *https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-redundancy#geo-redundant-storage **https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-disaster-recovery-guidance
upvoted 16 times
dylan_t
1 year, 6 months ago
You misunderstanding the question : GRS also give the possibilities to read. it's not specified that we need to read from the second region when the first is available + You have to reduce the cost : GRS is cheaper than RA-GRS because GRS will be available only if the first region failover (in the subject we can read IF AN OUTAGE OCCURES) : https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/storage/blobs/
upvoted 2 times
...
...
BK10
2 years, 10 months ago
It should be A because of two reasons: 1. Minimize cost 2. When primary is unavailable. Hence No need for RA_GRS
upvoted 32 times
Billybob0604
2 years ago
Exactly. This is the point. It clearly states ' in case of an outage' RA-GRS --> secondary region can be read also not in a case of outage
upvoted 7 times
...
AnonymousJhb
1 year, 7 months ago
its not A, dude, if you dont understand the difference between GRS and RA-GRS then u need az 101. With GRS, the 2nd region is NEVER available for access until Microsoft fails over the first failed region. Otherwise, you can NEVER access the 2nd regions data. Hence RA-GRS.
upvoted 5 times
semauni
1 year, 4 months ago
No need to be rude. The question specifies that the data in the second region needs to be available IF an outage occurs. So GRS is more than enough. It's not because you think otherwise that you're right.
upvoted 10 times
...
...
...
...
...
Sasha_in_San_Francisco
Highly Voted 2 months, 3 weeks ago
In my opinion, I believe the and answer is A, and this is why. In the question they state "...available for read workloads in a secondary region IF AN OUTAGE OCCURES in the primary...". Well, answer B (RA-GRS) states in Microsoft documentation that RA-GRS is for when "...your data is available to be read AT ALL TIMES, including in a situation where the primary region becomes unavailable." To me, the nature of the question is what is the cheapest solution which allows for failover to read workload, when there is an outage. Answer (A). Common sense would be 'A' too because that is probably the most often real-life use case.
upvoted 77 times
SabaJamal2010AtGmail
2 years, 11 months ago
It's not about common sense rather about technology. With GRS, data remains available even if an entire data center becomes unavailable or if there is a widespread regional failure. There would be a down time when a region becomes unavailable. Alternately, you could implement read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS), which provides read-access to the data in alternate locations.
upvoted 4 times
...
...
DP2032024
Most Recent 5 days, 15 hours ago
Selected Answer: B
Question has asked about "read workloads in a secondary region" - Hence answer would be B
upvoted 1 times
...
moize
6 days, 19 hours ago
Selected Answer: B
Pour assurer la disponibilité des données dans une région secondaire en cas de panne dans la région principale tout en minimisant les coûts, vous devriez utiliser le stockage géo-redondant à accès en lecture (RA-GRS) (Option B). Voici pourquoi : RA-GRS réplique vos données de manière asynchrone vers une région secondaire géographiquement éloignée, offrant ainsi une protection contre les pannes régionales1. En cas de panne dans la région principale, RA-GRS permet un accès en lecture aux données répliquées dans la région secondaire, ce qui assure la continuité des charges de travail de lecture1. Cette option équilibre bien la disponibilité et les coûts, car elle offre une haute disponibilité pour les lectures sans les coûts plus élevés associés à d'autres options de redondance.
upvoted 1 times
...
shinypriti23
1 week, 2 days ago
Selected Answer: B
RA-GRS offers the benefits of geo-redundant storage with additional read access to the secondary region. This means your data will be available for reading in a secondary region if the primary region goes down, ensuring high availability at a relatively low cost.
upvoted 1 times
...
EmnCours
2 weeks, 2 days ago
Selected Answer: A
Correct Answer: A
upvoted 1 times
...
Lestrang
2 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
While it is true that the customer/Microsoft has to initiate the failover, this is not elaborated in any sense in the question. What is the point of GRS if you cannot read from it after a failover? It provides the service needed, at the lowest cost. This would be different if there were keywords like "available immediately without downtime" or "automatically" but there are none, so well, if a region fails, you fail over, and read from secondary region. Bottom line: A. GRS
upvoted 3 times
...
semauni
2 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
In this scenario, the data in the secondary region only needs to be available IF the data isn't available in the primary region. Both GRS and RA-GRS accomplish that. The difference between GRS and RA-GRS is that the data in RA-GRS is always readable, even if the primary region is up, which also makes it more expensive. That is not necessary in this case, so GRS is the answer. Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-redundancy
upvoted 3 times
...
Amitj2625
2 months, 3 weeks ago
The correct answer is: B. read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS) With RA-GRS, your data is not only replicated to a secondary region (geo-redundant storage, GRS) but also allows read access to the data in the secondary region. This means that if there is an outage in the primary region, you can access and read the data from the secondary region, providing business continuity and reducing downtime. While geo-redundant storage (GRS) on its own provides data redundancy across regions, it only allows read and write access in the primary region. To meet the requirement of having read access in the secondary region during an outage, RA-GRS is the appropriate option. Zone-redundant storage (ZRS) and locally-redundant storage (LRS) do not provide the capability of data redundancy across regions, so they are not suitable for ensuring read access in a secondary region during a primary region outage.
upvoted 1 times
...
Joanna0
2 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
B. read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS) Most When configured to use globally redundant storage (GRS, GZRS, and RA-GZRS), Azure copies your data asynchronously to a secondary geographic region located hundreds of miles away. This level of redundancy allows you to recover your data if there's an outage throughout the entire primary region. Read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS) and read-access geo-zone-redundant storage (RA-GZRS) also provide geo-redundant storage, but offer the added benefit of read access to the secondary endpoint. These options are ideal for applications designed for high availability business-critical applications. If the primary endpoint experiences an outage, applications configured for read access to the secondary region can continue to operate. Microsoft recommends RA-GZRS for maximum availability and durability of your storage accounts. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-disaster-recovery-guidance
upvoted 1 times
...
Nanda_123456789
5 months ago
A is the correct answer - question clearly says 'if an outage' - then A - GRS, if it had said Secondary region should be always available for read then RA-GRS
upvoted 2 times
...
e56bb91
5 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
ChatGPT 4o To ensure that the data in your Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 container is available for read workloads in a secondary region in case of an outage in the primary region, while also minimizing costs, you should use Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage (RA-GRS).
upvoted 1 times
...
dgerok
8 months ago
Selected Answer: B
while GRS focuses solely on disaster recovery, RA-GRS extends this by allowing read access to secondary data https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-redundancy
upvoted 2 times
...
MBRSDG
8 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
B. read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS) If you want to have read-access to the storage in another area, you must choose RA-GZRS since otherwise you'll have not the second storage URL. Impossible to choose the cheapest option in this case.
upvoted 3 times
...
jppdks
8 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
It is clearly B. That's Azure Infrastructure 1.01. With GRS you cannot Read only failover
upvoted 1 times
...
gplusplus
8 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
Minimize costs is a
upvoted 1 times
...
gplusplus
8 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Doc clearly states that With an account configured for GRS or GZRS, data in the secondary region is not directly accessible to users or applications, unless a failover occurs. The failover process updates the DNS entry provided by Azure Storage so that the secondary endpoint becomes the new primary endpoint for your storage account. During the failover process, your data is inaccessible
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago