exam questions

Exam MD-101 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the MD-101 exam

Exam MD-101 topic 2 question 11 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's MD-101
Question #: 11
Topic #: 2
[All MD-101 Questions]

Your network contains an Active Directory domain named contoso.com.
You create a provisioning package named Package1 as shown in the following exhibit.

What is the maximum number of devices on which you can run Package1 successfully?

  • A. 1
  • B. 10
  • C. 25
  • D. unlimited
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️
The device name uses a single random number (applied by %RAND:1%). This allows for 10 unique values (0 ג€" 9).

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Merma
Highly Voted 3 years, 11 months ago
Answer is correct as shown in the example in link provided. "%RAND:<# of digits> Generates the specified number of random digits. Test%RAND:6% Test123456" In this case %RAND:<# of digits> Generates the specified number of random digits. Comp %RAND:1%. The computer name can be Comp0 - Comp9 = 10 as a maximum number of computers. "%SERIAL% Generates the serial number derived from the device. If the serial number causes the new name to exceed the 15 character limit, the serial number will be truncated from the beginning of the sequence."
upvoted 16 times
...
AyoR32
Most Recent 2 years, 4 months ago
This question sounds like another : Question #6Topic 1 You need to consider the underlined segment to establish whether it is accurate. You have recently created a provisioning package that uses Comp%RAND:1% as the device name. You will be able to successfully run the package on as much as 5 devices. Select `No adjustment required` if the underlined segment is accurate. If the underlined segment is inaccurate, select the accurate option. A. No adjustment required B. 10 C. 15 D. 20 2 similar questions and 2 different answers... Which answer is officially correct for Microsoft during a certification exam ?
upvoted 1 times
...
Antimus
2 years, 5 months ago
Another READ THE QUESTION question, I got stuck on how many times an account can join a machine to the domain and went down a rabbit hole
upvoted 1 times
...
MaxMink
2 years, 9 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Right!
upvoted 1 times
...
AL99
3 years, 1 month ago
Answer :B:10 device
upvoted 1 times
...
Hulisanimellla
3 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
ANSWER IS CORRECT
upvoted 1 times
...
PersoDaniels
3 years, 10 months ago
Answer B. is correct. 0-9 = 10 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/configuration/provisioning-packages/provision-pcs-for-initial-deployment#configure-settings
upvoted 3 times
...
Alphurs
3 years, 10 months ago
Answer is D
upvoted 2 times
Mujja
3 years, 10 months ago
I can see Merma's explanation, and at first it's what I thought. But it's a random number, not sequential. The same number could repeat for the 2nd, 3rd or 4th device. The PPKG has no history of which number has already been used, it's random. All devices will process the PPKG regardless. and you will end up with duplicate hostnames in AD.
upvoted 1 times
justabasicuser
3 years, 9 months ago
The PPKG package in this instance has to join it to the active directory domain which would not allow duplicates... I'd presume it would have issues then and fail to deploy
upvoted 3 times
...
AVR31
3 years ago
You cannot have duplicate names in AD. If the computer name already exists in AD, the package will fail.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
Perycles
3 years, 11 months ago
i'm agree with the answer - pc number depend on RAND capacity.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago