ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Microsoft Discussions
exam questions

Exam AZ-304 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AZ-304 exam
Go to Exam

Exam AZ-304 topic 3 question 16 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's AZ-304
Question #: 16
Topic #: 3
[All AZ-304 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are designing an Azure solution for a company that has four departments. Each department will deploy several Azure app services and Azure SQL databases.
You need to recommend a solution to report the costs for each department to deploy the app services and the databases. The solution must provide a consolidated view for cost reporting that displays cost broken down by department.
Solution: Create a new subscription for each department.
Does this meet the goal?

  • A. Yes
  • B. No
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️
by timHAG at April 30, 2021, 11:19 p.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
timHAG
Highly Voted 3 years, 12 months ago
it should be yes, with sub. for each dept. we can get the spending for each spending. RG for resource group will not fix it, RG for each dept. will.
upvoted 39 times
J4U
3 years, 7 months ago
Yes. We can create a consolidated report for all subscriptions under MG scope. Filters allows to see breakdown of resources under each subscription.
upvoted 2 times
J4U
3 years, 7 months ago
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/costs/group-filter
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
claudio82
Highly Voted 3 years, 11 months ago
Answer is correct. You need a CONSOLIDATED report, of all departments Dep 1 50 Dep 2 35 Dep 3 80 Dep 4 55 By subscription yo only get Subcription 1 50
upvoted 18 times
johnnsmith
3 years, 11 months ago
You can use management group as the scope and use "grouped by subscription". So the answer is yes.
upvoted 16 times
demonite
3 years, 11 months ago
agreed should be yes. It's under the same tenant.
upvoted 4 times
...
...
bertybert15
3 years, 1 month ago
You have a subscription for each department...therefor the subscription report will show the costs for that department only and a report from the MG level will consolidate all 4 Subs into 1 report
upvoted 1 times
...
...
RJ06
Most Recent 8 months, 1 week ago
I think it should be NO because having cost management at subscription level would include cost of other resources/resource groups created in that subsciption. The aim is to report on the costs for each department to deploy the "app services and the databases".
upvoted 1 times
...
rxlicon
1 year, 7 months ago
You have a subscription for each department...therefor the subscription report will show the costs for that department only and a report from the MG level will consolidate all 4 Subs into 1 report
upvoted 1 times
...
GaneshPP
2 years, 6 months ago
The question says - "The solution must provide a consolidated view for cost reporting that displays cost broken down by department.", so ans is No
upvoted 1 times
...
f2002642
2 years, 8 months ago
The correct answer as per the MS practice test is "NO".
upvoted 3 times
...
DChilds
2 years, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: B
The goal is to break down cost in the entire subscription by department so separate subscriptions is not the answer. Correct answer is B.
upvoted 1 times
nidhogg
2 years, 8 months ago
to break down cost in the entire SOLUTION by department. Subscriptions are not mentioned in the text. 'A' works well here.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
AubinBakana
2 years, 8 months ago
This question could better formulated. Here also you can get your answer. You just have to consider admin effort. Click each of the option can still lead you to the solution. I guess they want to emphasis on tag here?
upvoted 1 times
...
ajjihad1
2 years, 8 months ago
Each subscriptoin is one department. So generating a report based on the subscription will give us the spending of each department.
upvoted 1 times
...
cloudera
3 years ago
Selected Answer: A
Yes but not a good solution but should answer the question/
upvoted 1 times
cloudera
3 years ago
meant to say not a very bad solution. Another option is one subscription, RG for each department and tagging enforced for each resource.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
Eitant
3 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: A
Should be YES
upvoted 6 times
...
DerekKey
3 years, 5 months ago
Should be YES: Cost managment / Cost analysis / Scope: Account / Group by: Subscription
upvoted 3 times
...
syu31svc
3 years, 6 months ago
I would take No as the answer "consolidated view for cost reporting" would mean it falls under a single subscription
upvoted 2 times
...
poplovic
3 years, 7 months ago
Azure portal -> subscription -> cost management - > cost analysis. So "yes"
upvoted 2 times
...
souvik123
3 years, 7 months ago
YES : Subscription has a view of costs of resources used by department and convenient way.
upvoted 1 times
...
SnakePlissken
3 years, 10 months ago
Answer is Yes. This solution is the most convenient, costs are split per department without any effort.
upvoted 3 times
...
kbnk
3 years, 11 months ago
should be A-yes. That gives us consolidated and even detailed view on resources per dept without any effort
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago