Exam MB-335 topic 1 question 111 discussion

Period: Yes - since it will group requirements into the planned orders and thereby reduce levels. Secondly on-hand stock levels can be avoided in periods without the requirement. Min/Maks: Not good - Stock levels can be reduced but you would have to manually adjust min in the 2 different periods. Manual: No Requirement: No - would generate to one planned order per requirement and no inventory stock level.

I would that A is correct because the Period coverage code is often used for non-predictable inventory draw, season-influenced products, or high-cost products. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/supply-chain/master-planning/planning-optimization/replenishment-methods-quantity-modification

I would rather say Min/Max would be the best approach because considering the need to control inventory levels and manage space efficiently while taking into account the specific availability of the aluminum sheets, Min/Max is the most appropriate coverage dimension. It allows setting a maximum limit to prevent overstocking while ensuring there is enough inventory to meet production needs without taking up too much space or exceeding budget constraints.