exam questions

Exam PL-600 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PL-600 exam

Exam PL-600 topic 1 question 40 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's PL-600
Question #: 40
Topic #: 1
[All PL-600 Questions]

HOTSPOT
-

You are a Microsoft Power Platform architect gathering solution requirements for a customer. Management uses three different systems to locate asset inventory and contract details.

Management must view inventory with the ability to select assets and view additional details. Sales representatives have issues locating assets based on specific features in a timely manner when working with customers.

You need to prioritize the requirements.

Which priority should you use? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Ninashnash
Highly Voted 2 years ago
Based on the Priority Quadrants chart in the following document from Microsoft, the priority is categorized into four categories of "Quick Wins", "Big Investment", "Little Satisfiers", "Time Consumers" . so, Functional and Non Functional are ruled out. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-apps/guidance/planning/prioritizing-features
upvoted 15 times
Ninashnash
2 years ago
The remaining options for this question are: Quick Win and Time Consumer. To me, the right answer for Sales representatives requirements is "quick win" and for Managers is "time Consumer"
upvoted 2 times
Ninashnash
2 years ago
Well, I just realized this is related to "Features" not requirements. Therefore, the provided answer "NF", "F" are correct!. I wish I could delete my response
upvoted 10 times
dylan99
1 year, 1 month ago
Functional or Non functional help to categorize, not prioritize, so you were right
upvoted 3 times
...
...
...
...
xanr4711
Highly Voted 2 years ago
My Answers: Quick-Win, Big-Investment It's not about functional or non-function, it's about priotizing: Both requirements will have a big business impact The first one is easy to achieve, so Quick-Win The second one is harder to implement, so Big-Investment
upvoted 10 times
Peter1972
2 years ago
Absolutely agree with you.. This is a tricky question and my first impulse was also to use Non-Function and Functional but this is the categorization of the requirements and has nothing to do with the priorization.
upvoted 1 times
...
Aibloy
1 year, 11 months ago
"The first one is easy to achieve, so Quick-Win The second one is harder to implement, so Big-Investment" You don't know if it is easy or not, not enought context and architecture, if you can't classify the difficulty, for me is Non functional and functional.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
nishucrm
Most Recent 5 months, 1 week ago
Quick win and big investment.
upvoted 1 times
...
LSgeek
8 months, 2 weeks ago
Quick Win Functional
upvoted 1 times
...
rockyoz
1 year ago
No matter where the 3 systems are, the integration with them will be time consuming, so it will rull out quick win and little satisfier. Depends on what is the business impact, and how you evaluate management decisions and customer satisfictions. I would assume better time ensure better customer so sales one will be a time consumer. To me the management one can be a timer consumer too if it is has huge impact, i.e. we need the information to make decision. However, ideally there can be an baseline solution which may just be time consuming. So... Need more information. before that both time consumer.
upvoted 1 times
...
MrEz
1 year, 1 month ago
A) it is about priority B) Management uses three different systems to locate asset inventory and contract details asset inventory (1) and contract details (2) but 3 systems for these 2 business objects (it says nothing about contact as a third object). C)different systems -> not data verse. --> Data integration project is seldom a quick win, right? especially when you don't know if for the sales searching assets may search (integrate?) in 2 systems both time-consumers
upvoted 1 times
...
TW_27
1 year, 11 months ago
This is a trick question to make sure you're reading. It asks you to prioritize, NOT categorize as functional or non-functional.
upvoted 3 times
...
Parth91
1 year, 11 months ago
Enable sales representatives to locate assets in less time Priority: Quick Win Enable management to view inventory and asset details Priority: Functional, possibly Big Investment (depending on the scope and complexity of the current systems and the requirements for the new solution).
upvoted 2 times
...
hitmaker
2 years ago
1. Non Functional 2. Functional
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago