ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Microsoft Discussions
exam questions

Exam PL-400 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PL-400 exam
Go to Exam

Exam PL-400 topic 2 question 36 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's PL-400
Question #: 36
Topic #: 2
[All PL-400 Questions]

You develop a model-driven app to include a form containing several columns. Two groups of users. named Group1 and Group2 will access the form.

A column contains sensitive data that should not be read by Group2. Group1 must be able to access the column.

You need to prevent Group2 users from viewing the sensitive data.

What should you do?

  • A. Create a security role for users in Group1 to grant users access to the column.
  • B. Create multiple forms. Assign a form containing the sensitive data to Group1. Assign a form that does not contain the sensitive data to Group2.
  • C. Use JavaScript to set visibility of the column based on the group of the current user.
  • D. Create a field-level security profile for Group1 users to grant the users access to the column.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️
by Montoi at Feb. 21, 2023, 5:30 p.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
Montoi
Highly Voted 1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D. Create a field-level security profile for Group1 users to grant the users access to the column. Field-level security allows you to restrict access to specific fields in a table based on a user's security role.
upvoted 5 times
osx
3 months, 1 week ago
true "To restrict read access on a specific field in Dynamics 365 (D365) using field level security, navigate to your settings, select the relevant entity, choose the field you want to restrict, and then within the "Field Security" tab, set the read permission to "No Access" for the desired users or teams" we can define a field security profile to restrict group2 from viewing the field. But the answer is about granting access not restricting
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Juan0414
Most Recent 1 month, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
The documentation always recommends handling this situations using field-level security, because you would think that option B or C can do the job, but what it does is only hide the columns from the user (At the UI level), but the user can still do some workarounds to access the data because it is not blocked at the data level.
upvoted 1 times
...
Abhi100889
4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
I feel creating multiple form is an easy option. Managing field security profiles for multiple columns and user is recurrent process. You always have to update field securiy profile whenever user position changes or user leaves organization or someone joins newly.
upvoted 1 times
...
uday20
10 months, 1 week ago
D does not prevent users from Gorup 2 to view the sensitive data. does creating multiple forms satisfy the need?
upvoted 1 times
...
Net_IT
1 year ago
Selected Answer: D
Seems correct to me. Field-level security allows you to restrict access to specific fields (columns) for different groups of users. In this case, you can create a field-level security profile that grants access to the sensitive data column for Group1 users and denies access to Group2 users. This approach ensures that Group2 users will not be able to view the sensitive data while allowing Group1 users to access it.
upvoted 1 times
...
At09
1 year ago
Correct
upvoted 1 times
...
jkaur
1 year, 2 months ago
correct
upvoted 1 times
...
whiteblack
1 year, 5 months ago
Yes correct
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago