I remember that if you are running an Window OS in your host, you are only able to run "flavors" of Windows OS (things that are based on Windows OS).
Another example is if you run your host OS on Ubuntu, then you will be able to run RHEL and CentOS in your containers but not Window OS.
Apologies if I am incorrect but that is what my hypothesis is.
A, B, and D are right.
C is traditional KVM
With E, yes if hypervisor was replaced with container namespace and the same kernel execution were referenced, then this would be accurate. So choice E is wrong. However, LXC does focus on OS containerization and the goal is to not need a separate kernel.
https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/manpages/man5/lxc.container.conf.5.html
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Matalongo
3 months, 2 weeks agoNeoSam999
1 year, 6 months agoLazylinux
2 years, 2 months agoCuriousLinuxCat
3 years, 1 month agomacchi
3 years, 4 months agoMcLaba
3 years, 2 months agoiwkno6
2 years, 11 months agoKicoRox
2 years, 9 months ago[Removed]
2 years, 7 months ago[Removed]
2 years, 7 months ago