Click the Exhibit button. You are troubleshooting connectivity between an EVPN spine switch configured as a route reflector and a leaf node with an IP address of 10.30.100.6. Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?
A.
The neighbor 10.30.100.3 statement is missing from leaf1’s configuration.
B.
The spine node is not configured for the family inet NLRI.
C.
The neighbor 10.30.100.6 statement is missing from spine1’s configuration.
D.
The leaf node is not configured for the family evpn NLRI.
For Spine and Leaf connection, you only need family evpn and that's it. So the logs reveals spine mentions it received leaf's open message with NLRI capacity as inet-unicast, the leaf can keep it that way but most importantly, the leaf must have the capacity to support evpn family, so the answer is D.
When using EVPN in a Spine and Leaf network architecture, you only need to configure the family EVPN protocol on the Spine and Leaf switches. This will allow the switches to exchange MAC addresses and other relevant information required to establish Layer 2 connectivity between devices.
B. The spine node is not configured for the family inet NLRI.
family inet == inet-unicast. 10.30.100.6 is sending notification and tearing down the BGP session because address family has not been configured.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
chicharito14
Highly Voted 1 year, 9 months agowassupkay
Most Recent 11 months agoharrypogi
1 year, 2 months agohbstyleboy
1 year, 8 months agosanalainen
1 year, 8 months agodragossky
1 year, 10 months ago