You have a mixed vendor EVPN environment and you need to ensure VXLAN interoperability between all devices. In tins scenario, winch statement is correct?
Option C is correct.
https://blogs.juniper.net/en-us/service-provider-transformation/juniper-delivers-evpn-vxlan-data-center-fabric-overlays-with-multi-vendor-interoperability
should be B; https://blogs.juniper.net/en-us/service-provider-transformation/juniper-delivers-evpn-vxlan-data-center-fabric-overlays-with-multi-vendor-interoperability "The recommended approach of using EVPN Type 5 routes for multi-vendor fabric environments is possible due to the fact that it has fewer dependencies on other EVPN route types and because most vendors have adopted precisely the same Type 5 route IP-VRF-to-IP-VRF interface-less service model."
I think C is correct,
1)"With IETF standards-based EVPN-VXLAN on Junos software, this can be achieved even when remote locations are located behind multiple IP domains or connected to different vendors supporting EVPN Type 2 (VLAN-aware bundle service) model or EVPN Type 5 (prefix advertisement) model"
2)"............in order to benefit from more advanced features such as EVPN-VXLAN stitching or pure overlay multicast. Alternatively, POD2 could be from a different vendor supporting EVPN Type 5 routes or EVPN Type 2 VLAN-aware bundle service type."
It doesn't say all vendors however, so the answer is C.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Sparks026
2 years agosomanyquestions
3 years, 1 month agoRdpk
2 years, 11 months agoTriviumGG
1 year, 3 months ago