Correct answer is D.
Answer A would be incorrect since, considering you already have a large netowork, by simply configuring a 'virtual-router 'routing-instance', it will not separate the the large network into smaller administrative entities. In fact it would make everything more complex. This simply would not be the main task of a 'virtual-router 'routing-instance'.
Answer B is incorrect since several 'routing-instance' types exist like: evpn, l2vpn, mpls-forwarding, virtual-switch, vpls, others...
Answer C is incorrect since, there exist different main mechanisms to deal with L3 VPN implementations.
Correct answer is D.
When a 'routing-instance' - 'instance-type' - 'virtual-router' is created a new routing table, thus forwarding table is logically created. Evidence:
admin@Juniper-1# set routing-instances TEST instance-type virtual-router
admin@Juniper-1# run show route | match TEST
TEST.inet6.0: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)←←←
admin@Juniper-1# run show route forwarding-table | match TEST
Routing table: TEST.inet←←←
Routing table: TEST.iso←←←
Routing table: TEST.inet6←←←
This should be A.
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/routing-overview/topics/concept/routing-instances-overview.html
upvoted 1 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.JN0-362 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
FR99
2 years, 10 months agoRagnahardt
3 years, 4 months agoRagnahardt
3 years, 4 months agokkched
3 years, 8 months agokkched
3 years, 8 months agopenguin02007
3 years, 9 months ago