Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam JN0-663 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the JN0-663 exam

Exam JN0-663 topic 1 question 54 discussion

Actual exam question from Juniper's JN0-663
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-663 Questions]

What are two reasons an IBGP learned route would be hidden? (Choose two.)

  • A. The route is suppressed by damping.
  • B. The route has a next hop of the local routing device.
  • C. The route is rejected by an export policy.
  • D. The route has an empty AS path.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: AB 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
ztw3587t
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: AB
A and B are correct
upvoted 1 times
...
mohdema
1 year, 12 months ago
Selected Answer: AB
It’s AB C would be correct if it was an import policy
upvoted 1 times
...
mohdema
1 year, 12 months ago
Leaning towards B & C BGP route flapping describes the situation in which BGP systems send an excessive number of update messages to advertise network reachability information. BGP flap damping is a method of reducing the number of update messages sent between BGP peers, thereby reducing the load on these peers, without adversely affecting the route convergence time for stable routes. Flap damping reduces the number of update messages by marking routes as ineligible for selection as the active or preferable route. Marking routes in this way leads to some delay, or suppression, in the propagation of route information, but the result is increased network stability. You typically apply flap damping to external BGP (EBGP) routes (routes in different ASs). You can also apply flap damping within a confederation, between confederation member ASs. Because routing consistency within an AS is important, do not apply flap damping to internal BGP (IBGP) routes. (If you do, it is ignored.)
upvoted 1 times
mohdema
1 year, 12 months ago
I was wrong as an export policy is applied after the RIB and not before the correct scheme being confederation boundary. The process in BGP is Route sent from peer ->> Adj-Rib-in ->>>import policy ->>> route selection ->>> RIB-Local Which makes the import no-export plausible for the routes received from R1 as you are preventing the propagation of the route within AS FOR routes you are sending the path is : RIB-local ->>> export policy ->>> Adj-RIB ->>> peer Then the no advertise export makes sense ! You should check JNCIP free courses on juniper learning You are asking peers in the same AS not to advertise to other AS ; the routes will be contained only in the AS
upvoted 1 times
...
...
jncie_examer
2 years, 1 month ago
Even if for some reason you think A is incorrect. C and D are the most incorrect.
upvoted 1 times
...
vasiliy19
3 years, 4 months ago
A could not be correct because: Because routing consistency within an AS is important, do not apply flap damping to internal BGP (IBGP) routes. (If you do, it is ignored.) https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/bgp-flap-damping.html
upvoted 1 times
anonymonkey
3 years, 3 months ago
same link: There is an exception that rule. Starting in Junos OS Release 12.2, you can apply flap damping at the address family level. In a Junos OS Release 12.2 or later installation, when you apply flap damping at the address family level, it works for both IBGP and EBGP. By default, route flap damping is not enabled. Damping is applied to external peers and to peers at confederation boundaries. A&B
upvoted 9 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...