exam questions

Exam JN0-648 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the JN0-648 exam

Exam JN0-648 topic 1 question 9 discussion

Actual exam question from Juniper's JN0-648
Question #: 9
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-648 Questions]

Click the Exhibit button.

A router is attempting to form an OSPF neighborship with another router. However, the OSPF neighborship fails to establish completely.
Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?

  • A. There is an interface type mismatch.
  • B. There is an interface subnet mask mismatch.
  • C. There is an OSPF area mismatch.
  • D. There is an interface MTU mismatch.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
rrahim
Highly Voted 4 years, 4 months ago
There is another question with different log but also interface mismatch. That is sus. https://networksarena.wordpress.com/2017/01/01/trouble-shooting-ospf-adjacency-problems-2/ if an OSPF adjacency has one side set to the default broadcast mode, and the other side set to point-to-point mode or point-to-multipoint mode, the adjacency will fail. ali@Router1> show log OSPFLOG Jan 1 20:50:23 Router1 clear-log[1166]: logfile cleared Jan  1 20:50:24.565357 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.12.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-0/0/1.112 IFL 71 area 0.0.0.0) Jan  1 20:50:24.565388   Version 2, length 48, ID 163.121.1.2, area 0.0.0.0 Jan  1 20:50:24.565394   checksum 0x0, authtype 1 Jan  1 20:50:24.565400   mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128 Jan  1 20:50:24.565406   dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.12.2, BDR 0.0.0.0 Jan  1 20:50:24.565412 OSPF packet ignored: configuration mismatch from 10.100.12.2 on intf ge-0/0/1.112 area 0.0.0.0
upvoted 5 times
...
nushadu
Most Recent 3 years, 5 months ago
ed@vMX_R2# show protocols ospf area 0.0.0.1 | display set set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.1 nssa default-lsa default-metric 50 set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.1 nssa no-summaries set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.1 interface em1.2 [edit] ed@vMX_R2# run show log ospf-log.txt ...omitted ... Nov 14 14:45:13.913959 OSPF packet ignored: configuration mismatch from 10.0.24.4 on intf em1.2 area 0.0.0.1 Nov 14 14:45:23.402365 OSPF packet ignored: configuration mismatch from 10.0.24.4 on intf em1.2 area 0.0.0.1 Nov 14 14:45:33.121895 RPD_OSPF_NBRUP: OSPF neighbor 10.0.24.4 (realm ospf-v2 em1.2 area 0.0.0.1) state changed from Init to 2Way due to 2Way) Nov 14 14:45:33.215716 Formatting error in LSA Nov 14 14:45:33.216048 RPD_OSPF_NBRUP: OSPF neighbor 10.0.24.4 (realm ospf-v2 em1.2 area 0.0.0.1) state changed from Loading to Full due to L) Nov 14 14:45:33.648589 Formatting error in LSA
upvoted 1 times
nushadu
3 years, 5 months ago
tested in the LAB - logs triggered with wrong int-type [ptp <-> broadcast] ed@vMX_R2# show | compare [edit protocols ospf area 0.0.0.1 interface em1.2] - interface-type p2p;
upvoted 1 times
...
...
yemicontrol
4 years, 1 month ago
The answer is D
upvoted 1 times
TQU29
3 years, 10 months ago
But JunOS can detect MTU mismatch and generate an explicite log "MTU mismatch". Same for area mismatch. We can see in logs that OSPF hello are send with ip address which match the mask, so the configuration mismatch come from the interface type. https://netdevops.me/2015/06/ospf-neighbors-on-a-point-to-broadcast-network/
upvoted 4 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago