exam questions

Exam JN0-361 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the JN0-361 exam

Exam JN0-361 topic 1 question 19 discussion

Actual exam question from Juniper's JN0-361
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-361 Questions]

You are establishing RSVP LSPs through your MPLS-enabled network. You are asked to ensure that the LSPs will support end-to-end class-of-service handling.
Which statement is correct in this scenario?

  • A. Configure ultimate-hop-popping on the egress device.
  • B. Configure implicit-null on all MPLS-enabled devices.
  • C. Configure explicit-null on all MPLS-enabled devices.
  • D. Configure entropy-label on the egress device.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
DIbyam
3 years, 9 months ago
C. Configure explicit-null on all MPLS-enabled devices. I think "C" is the correct answer.
upvoted 2 times
...
Bhuyan
4 years, 1 month ago
we should configure ultimate hop pop only on ingress router
upvoted 1 times
...
exambreaker
4 years, 1 month ago
Its A because, by default egress LSR signals to the PHP router for implicit-null label so the PHP LSR can send an ip packet instead of labeled packet. But we want to be able to copy the qos information on the egress LSR so it needs to signal explicit-null label to PHP LSR: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/lsp-labels.html
upvoted 2 times
...
vanvoust
4 years, 5 months ago
I think the answer is C: We can say the implicit-null label is used by default and works well if the network has not particular QoS requirement, or if the QoS is end to end between the CPEs. On the other hand, the explicit-null label is used when the MPLS core network needs to know the QoS values. https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Routing/MPLS-explicit-null/td-p/314224
upvoted 1 times
magmartin
3 years, 11 months ago
But the answer says "configure explicit-null in ALL devices", which is not correct. You should configure it just in the egress router, and the behaviour of doing that is the anwer A "Configure ultimate-hop-popping on the egress device."
upvoted 1 times
...
...
chgook
4 years, 7 months ago
I think A is correct because explict-null don't need to config all MPLS router.
upvoted 2 times
vanvoust
4 years, 5 months ago
A is definitely wrong asonfigure this statement on the device at the LSP ingress. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/configuration-statement/ultimate-hop-popping-edit-protocols-mpls.html
upvoted 1 times
...
...
networkingcontrol
5 years, 4 months ago
The correct is C.
upvoted 1 times
...
Sparks026
5 years, 6 months ago
C is the correct answer based on the fact that When an LSR receives an MPLS header in which the label is set to 3, it always POPs the header i.e., it removes the top label. ... An explicit null (Label Value 0 for IPv4), on the other hand, leaves the MPLS header in place until it reaches the egress, preserving the LSP CoS behavior across the entire LSP.
upvoted 2 times
...
NC9337
5 years, 8 months ago
This seems to be wrong. PHP will remove label to egress router, and also remove the ability for the egress router to forward with the CoS in the MPLS network. "When Explicit Null is configured a label value of 0 is signalled to the penultimate router which instructs the router to push an MPLS Shim Label onto packets that are destined for the final hop. In certain cases the requirement for Explicit Null may be desirable, for example to maintain CoS values attributed to the LSP, as the CoS value would normally be discarded at the penultimate router if PHP were enabled."
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago