Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam JN0-351 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the JN0-351 exam

Exam JN0-351 topic 1 question 11 discussion

Actual exam question from Juniper's JN0-351
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-351 Questions]

You are configuring an IS-IS IGP network and do not see the IS-IS adjacencies established.
In this scenario, what are two reasons for this problem? (Choose two.)

  • A. MTU is not at least 1492 bytes.
  • B. IP subnets are not a /30 address.
  • C. The Level 2 routers have mismatched areas.
  • D. The Io0 interface is not included as an IS-IS interface.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: AD 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
sandaruwann654
6 months ago
Selected Answer: AD
A,D are correct
upvoted 2 times
...
kopcink
9 months, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: AD
AD are correct - ac89l explained it well. Also, B and C would be incorrect because: IS-IS adjacencies don't rely on IP protocol, you don't even need an IP configuration on links used for forming an adjancency. Also, the one of the points of Level-2 routers is to form an adjacency between different areas.
upvoted 1 times
...
ac89l
11 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: AD
chatGPT: The two reasons for the IS-IS adjacencies not being established could be: A. MTU is not at least 1492 bytes. D. The Io0 interface is not included as an IS-IS interface. Explanation: A. IS-IS may have issues establishing adjacencies if the Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) is not set correctly. It is recommended to set the MTU to at least 1492 bytes for IS-IS. D. The Loopback 0 (Io0) interface should typically be included as an IS-IS interface. Loopback interfaces are often used as the source for IS-IS routing updates, and omitting them could prevent adjacencies from forming. So, options A and D are the correct reasons for the problem.
upvoted 2 times
BGP_Wedgy
2 days, 12 hours ago
I correct my statement. Lower MTU than 1492, IS-IS works "sometimes" due to the PDU being fragmented for the bigger PDU with CSNPs or PSNPs. 'A' is definitely the best choice here.
upvoted 1 times
...
BGP_Wedgy
2 days, 12 hours ago
I crossed checked this with a lab. IS-IS does not have strick requirements for mtu. MTU size is important for overall network performance, it is not a direct cause of IS-IS adjacency issues in this context.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...