the methods for communicating between routing instances are as follows:
static route with a next-hop of next-table pointing to the appropriate routing table which contains more accurate information
rib-groups to mirror routing information from one route-table to another. However, in many cases, in order to make this work, interface-routes also need to be mirrored. RIB Group policy can be used to constrain the routing information
instance-import and instance-export statements configured within the individual routing-instances to leak routes from one table to another. Again, policy can be used here to constrain the routing information. This method is more straightforward than the rib-group method
A final approach is to use physical interfaces or logical-tunnels to stitch routing-instances and use a routing protocol or static routes across this connection between the two routing-instances.
A. Use a non-forwarding instance: A non-forwarding instance is used for tasks that require routing information but do not participate in the actual packet forwarding. It does not directly facilitate the sharing of routes between routing instances.
C. Create a forwarding instance: A forwarding instance is used for packet forwarding in Junos OS. While it's involved in the forwarding of packets, it's not a mechanism for sharing routes between routing instances.
So, options B and D are the correct ways to share routes between routing instances in Junos OS.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Sailor
Highly Voted 1 year, 6 months agoLaminejuve
1 year, 6 months agoalicenaihi
Most Recent 10 months, 3 weeks agoBob_Smith
1 year, 1 month agoMisho_e_pich_2023
1 year, 2 months agozineeddine
1 year, 6 months ago