Look at this question from a management perspective. Black- box testing requires less efforts for preparation. Next to that it simulate real-world attacks.
C. simulate real-world attacks
Black-box control tests simulate real-world attacks because they are conducted with limited knowledge of the internal workings of the system or application being tested. Testers approach the system as an external entity, similar to a potential attacker who doesn't have insider knowledge. This helps identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses that might be exploited by real attackers. White-box control tests, on the other hand, involve testing with knowledge of the internal structure and code of the system, which may not always reflect how a real-world attacker would interact with the system.
The PRIMARY advantage of performing black-box control tests as opposed to white-box control tests is that they simulate real-world attacks. Black-box testing is conducted with no prior knowledge of the system under test, simulating the perspective of an external attacker. This approach provides a realistic assessment of an organization's security posture and identifies vulnerabilities that might not be uncovered through other testing methods. In contrast, white-box testing is performed with full knowledge of the system's architecture, design, and source code, making it less realistic and less able to detect external threats.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
afb4b17
1 month agoJess20
7 months, 2 weeks agooluchecpoint
10 months, 1 week agoAgamennore
10 months, 2 weeks ago[Removed]
1 year agorichck102
1 year agosedardna
1 year, 1 month agoAbhey
1 year, 2 months agobaranikumar_v
1 year, 6 months agoaokisan
1 year, 6 months agoEZPASS
1 year, 8 months agoZiggybooboo
1 year, 8 months ago