exam questions

Exam CISM All Questions

View all questions & answers for the CISM exam

Exam CISM topic 1 question 304 discussion

Actual exam question from Isaca's CISM
Question #: 304
Topic #: 1
[All CISM Questions]

A security policy exception is leading to an unexpected increase in the number of alerts about suspicious Internet traffic on an organization's network. Which of the following is the BEST course of action?

  • A. Remove the rules that trigger the increased number of alerts.
  • B. Present a risk analysis with recommendations to senior management.
  • C. Update the risk register so that senior management is kept informed.
  • D. Evaluate and update the enterprise network security architecture.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
oluchecpoint
Highly Voted 5 months, 4 weeks ago
D. Evaluating and updating the enterprise network security architecture is the best course of action because it involves a comprehensive approach to addressing the issue. By reviewing the security architecture, you can identify the root cause of the increased alerts, determine how the security policy exception is impacting the network, and make necessary adjustments to the architecture to mitigate the risk. This ensures that the organization's security posture is improved, and it aligns with best practices for managing security incidents. Additionally, after the evaluation, you can still present a risk analysis and recommendations to senior management, but it will be based on a more informed assessment of the situation.
upvoted 6 times
oluchecpoint
5 months, 4 weeks ago
Option B suggests conducting a risk analysis to understand why the security policy exception is causing an increase in alerts and then presenting this analysis, along with recommendations, to senior management. This approach allows the organization to make informed decisions about how to proceed, balancing security with business needs. It's important to involve senior management in the decision-making process to ensure that the organization's security posture aligns with its overall strategic goals.
upvoted 2 times
hohan
1 month, 2 weeks ago
If there is an exception, it means that it got already got approved by senior management. It does not make sense to report alert increase to the senior management in this case. Evaluating and updating is what makes more sense to fine tune the rule and make the exception.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
...
hohan
Most Recent 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
It is reasonable to interpret that the policy exception has been approved. Therefore, the BEST course of action is to evaluate and update the enterprise network security architecture to address the operational challenges caused by the exception
upvoted 1 times
...
oluchecpoint
5 months, 4 weeks ago
B - Final answer
upvoted 2 times
...
Agamennore
6 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
In this case a management decision is the best option
upvoted 2 times
...
AaronS1990
6 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
If it's causing a lot of unexpected alerts, you need to analyse the possible risks that come with it. B
upvoted 1 times
...
Sammy65
7 months, 1 week ago
B: es la respuesta
upvoted 1 times
...
karanvp
8 months, 2 weeks ago
Network Architecture diagram needs to be updated as per the Policy Exception approval
upvoted 2 times
...
wello
9 months ago
Selected Answer: B
the decision to update the architecture should be based on the risk analysis and recommendations presented to senior management.
upvoted 1 times
...
richck102
9 months ago
B. Present a risk analysis with recommendations to senior management.
upvoted 1 times
...
Broesweelies
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Present a risk analysis with recommendations to senior management. If a security policy exception is leading to an unexpected increase in the number of alerts about suspicious Internet traffic on an organization's network, the best course of action would be to conduct a risk analysis to determine the potential impact of the exception on the organization and present recommendations to senior management. The risk analysis should include an assessment of the likelihood and potential impact of the increased traffic, as well as an evaluation of the existing security controls and their effectiveness in mitigating the risk. Based on the results of the analysis, recommendations can be made to senior management on how to address the issue, such as implementing additional security controls or revising the security policy.
upvoted 4 times
...
Fruitykid
1 year, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Evaluation would involve risk assessing the policy exception, then reporting to the committee and then updating the security can mean a removal of the exception or configuring the tool appropriately
upvoted 2 times
...
del_rjo
1 year, 2 months ago
If the network is configured in a way that causes a "security policy exception" then this really should be reviewed and updated, shouldn't it? Furthermore, why involve "...to senior management" (as it says in B) if this should be able to be taken to the steering commitee?
upvoted 3 times
...
EZPASS
1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: B
I would also go with B.
upvoted 2 times
...
N1co_o
1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Look like B
upvoted 2 times
...
Ziggybooboo
1 year, 3 months ago
Look at the exceptions that are causing the increase in alerts I think
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago