Not sure how a decentralized risk register by itself would make the aggregated total risk exceed the appetite or tolerance when if fact it should just be the same total risk had it been consolidated. Hence, this problem would stem from having an inconsistent analysis resulting to an inaccurate picture of the aggregated risk. So for me, it should be D
Decentralized risk registers mean that different departments or teams within an organization may maintain their own separate risk registers, it can also result in duplication of effort, lack of coordination, and inconsistent risk management practices.
I don't know why it is D. Even there have 2 risk register. It is follow the same risk analysis practice. I support A as management is difficult to manage total risk picture in a easy way.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
jennarink13
1 month agokertyce
1 month ago[Removed]
2 months ago[Removed]
2 months agoCbtL
2 months, 3 weeks agoKoulyo
3 months, 1 week agojohn_boogieman
4 months, 3 weeks agotsangckl
1 year, 3 months agoRaj1510
1 year, 5 months agoMusMus
1 year, 6 months agoARAMiS
2 years ago